1999
DOI: 10.1080/028418699432950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the Dose Level for a Given Treatment Plan to Maximize the Complication-free Tumor Cure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plans created by biological optimization can be evaluated using the build-in dose volume analysis tool and/or the add-on biological evaluation tool. The objective functions which are to be maximized or minimized during the optimization include the TCP Poisson-LQ and the NTCP Poisson-LQ [20][26]. The TCP and NTCP Poisson-LQ could be obtained either based on the Linear Quadratic (LQ) cell survival model or equivalently the Linear dose-response model with the Equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plans created by biological optimization can be evaluated using the build-in dose volume analysis tool and/or the add-on biological evaluation tool. The objective functions which are to be maximized or minimized during the optimization include the TCP Poisson-LQ and the NTCP Poisson-LQ [20][26]. The TCP and NTCP Poisson-LQ could be obtained either based on the Linear Quadratic (LQ) cell survival model or equivalently the Linear dose-response model with the Equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work by Lind et al , the concept of maximizing the probability of uncomplicated tumour control, P + , as a function of dose has been proposed to find the optimum dose level [10]. It should be noted that the TOC graph provides unbiased information in comparison to the P + graph when plotted as a function of dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the TCP/NTCP trade-off is difficult to assess in current treatment planning systems, even for a simple ‘dose scalarisation’ approach where only the prescription dose of a given treatment plan is changed for either a fixed number of fractions or for a fixed fraction dose. The concept of maximizing the probability of uncomplicated tumour control, P + , as a function of dose has been proposed to find the single optimum dose level for this approach [9,10]. The criticism against this measure is that an a priori ‘rigid’ trade-off between TCP and NTCP is assumed without knowing their interrelationship over the range of potential dose prescriptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our choice of 5% is arbitrary, and was selected as a starting point for this study. We also calculated the tumor control probability (TCP) using a linear Poisson distribution, 7 , 9 using D50 and γ of 51.97 Gy and 1.8, respectively, for non‐small cell lung cancer, (8) and normalizing the prescription to 66 Gy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%