1984
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889884011468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the experimental resolution for small-angle scattering

Abstract: The instrumental optimization conditions for most small-angle scattering experiments in which the data are azimuthally symmetric require that the scattered flight path be equal to the incident flight path. This is in contrast to a recent analysis which shows that under some conditions the incident and scattered flight paths are in a ratio of two to one. The equal flight-path condition is also valid for experiments measuring sharp (Bragg-like) peaks, or where the intensity is required at specific scattering vec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 To minimize peak asymmetry, as shown in Fig. 4, the dimension of q y 2 should approach that of q x 2 .…”
Section: B the Resolution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 To minimize peak asymmetry, as shown in Fig. 4, the dimension of q y 2 should approach that of q x 2 .…”
Section: B the Resolution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the SANS instrument in this normal configuration the resolution is AQ, = 0.081 nm-1. Using a pinhole of size 0.7 mm before the sample and a shorter source-sample distance, the data (also shown in Figure 4) now have a resolution AQ, = 0.112 nm-1 (with the source term dominant in the resolution expression [9]). …”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first aperture becomes the effective source position and the sample is placed immediately beyond the second aperture. The instrumental optimization conditions for most small-angle scattering experiments have been given before (Schmatz, Springer, Schelten & Ibel, 1974;Mildner & Carpenter, 1984). These require that the distances LI, between the effective source and the sample, and L2, between the sample and the detector, are the same, and that the size of the effective source R 1 and the sample R 2 are related to the detector-element size, X 3 by Y3, by…”
Section: Focusing Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, at small angles. In papers I and II (Mildner & Carpenter, 1984, 1987, we have written the scattering vector in terms of quantities T,(r), which depend on the ratio of transverse to longitudinal dimensions up to the second power. Paper I gives the average values of the scattering vector and its magnitude in terms of these quantities.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%