Optimization Transmission Theory and Technical Pathways that Describe Multiscale Urban Agglomeration Spaces

Abstract

Urban agglomerations are spatial entities that promote the development of 'new urbanization' processes within China. In this context, the concept of 'multiscale urban agglomeration spaces' encompasses three linked levels: macroscale urban agglomerations, mesoscale cities, and microscale urban centers. Applying a series of multidisciplinary integrated research methods drawn from geography, urban planning, and architecture, this paper reveals two intensive utilization laws that can be generalized to apply to multiscale urban agglomeration spaces, top-to-bottom 'positive transmission' linkage and inside-to-outside 'negative transmission' movement. This paper also proposes optimization transmission theory and policy decision technical pathways that can be applied to these three urban agglomeration spatial scales. Specific technical pathways of transmission include intensive expansion and simulated decision-making in macroscale urban agglomerations, ecology, production, and living space intensive layout and dynamic decision-making in mesoscale cities, and four cores (i.e., 'single, ring, axis, and pole core') progressive linkage and intensive optimization decision-making in microscale urban centers. The theory and technical pathways proposed in this paper solve the technical problem of optimization and provide intensive methods that can be applied not only at the individual level but also at multiple scales in urban agglomeration spaces. This study also advances a series of comprehensive technical solutions that can be applied to both compact and smart growth cities as well as to urban agglomerations. Solid theoretical support is provided for the optimization of Chinese land development, urbanization, agricultural development, and ecological security.

Spatial Suitability Evaluation of an Arid City Based on the Perspective of Major Function Oriented Zoning: A Case Study of Urumqi City in Xinjiang, China

“…Secondly, the evaluation scales have been dominated by counties and cities in cross-regional research [43]. FANG Chuanglin proposed the concept of 'multiscale urban agglomeration spaces' for the optimization of Chinese land development, urbanization, agricultural development, and ecological security [44] The scale tends to become smaller in single city studies-the spatial resolutions in previous small scale studies have been 5 m, 10 m, and 30 m, etc. [45,46] and the resolution has mainly been 30 m, while it is 5 m in this study.…”

Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors in the Ecological Well-Being Performance of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Hierarchical Perspective

“…It has become a significant growth pole for China's economic development and a primary space for building an ecological security barrier [51]. However, the development of the MRYRUA is relatively low, and it is still in the stage of rapid development [52]. The pressure on population, resources, and the environment is tremendous, and the problem of environmental pollution is prominent.…”

Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province

“…In order to achieve sustainable development of geographical space, in 2012, the Chinese government proposed the principle of the national territorial space development: optimizing the allocation of natural and socioeconomic resources for high-efficiency and intensive production, comfortable living, and eco-friendly territorial space [3][4][5][6]. With the discussion and popularization of the concept of production-living-ecological space (PLES) [7,8], the identification of PLES [9,10], the evolution of PLES [11,12], and PLES functionality [13,14] have become research hotspots in the fields of landscape planning and urban planning. Current studies on the identification of PLES mainly focus on the national land space [15], provincial spaces [16,17], and urban spaces [18,19].…”