2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09633-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization, validation and initial clinical implications of a Luminex-based immunoassay for the quantification of Fragile X Protein from dried blood spots

Abstract: Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is caused by a trinucleotide expansion leading to silencing of the FMR1 gene and lack of expression of Fragile X Protein (FXP, formerly known as Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, FMRP). Phenotypic presentation of FXS is highly variable, and the lack of reproducible, sensitive assays to detect FXP makes evaluation of peripheral FXP as a source of clinical variability challenging. We optimized a Luminex-based assay to detect FXP in dried blot spots for increased reproducibility and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FMRP was detected at the level of 7.55 pm or 0.347 pg/10 3 WBC or about 19% of normal FMRP expression in males. The reference range for males with normal FMR1 allele is 1.83+/−0.28 pg/10 3 WBC (Adayev, unpublished data) or 28 pm FMRP reported for males in a typically developing control group 26 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FMRP was detected at the level of 7.55 pm or 0.347 pg/10 3 WBC or about 19% of normal FMRP expression in males. The reference range for males with normal FMR1 allele is 1.83+/−0.28 pg/10 3 WBC (Adayev, unpublished data) or 28 pm FMRP reported for males in a typically developing control group 26 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The reference range for males with normal FMR1 allele is 1.83+/−0.28 pg/10 3 WBC (Adayev, unpublished data) or 28 pm FMRP reported for males in a typically developing control group. 26 In 2022, the original archived DNA was reanalyzed and showed 280-284 CGG repeats with no AGGs identified. 27 Methylation analysis using a PCR-based high resolution and sensitivity assay demonstrated 0% methylation.…”
Section: Genetics Evaluation and Molecular Findings (Table 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first examined 5% FDR corrected Spearman’s correlations between EEG measures and clinical measures across all FXS participants. We next examined exploratory clinical correlations in males with FXS who are expected to have significantly less FXP protein expression compared to females with FXS 23 . All FXS (see Table X): The WJ3 was used to quantify selective auditory attention (including speech-sound discrimination and resistance to auditory stimulus), with higher scores indicating better performance 24 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that the human sample is genetically more heterogeneous, including mosaic males and females (who are obligate mosaics) and increased FXP production should lead to normalization of brain signals. In addition, non-trivial amounts of peripheral FXP have been observed in a proportion of non-mosaic full mutation males 23 . Second, ignoring nomenclature, scalp potentials in mice, as in humans, represent a mixture of source activity at each electrode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting in future studies to correlate FMRP expression levels with individual mouse behaviors, particularly considering the variability in FMRP expression seen among mice in this study. In humans, FMRP expression is reported to vary among clinically normal and FXS subjects [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Investigating other genetic markers of FXS in these FXS-like mice would also help to further characterize this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%