2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00132.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized delivery of skin keratinocytes by aerosolization and suspension in fibrin tissue adhesive

Abstract: Aerosolized suspensions of keratinocytes provide a potential therapy for wounds, but the effects of aerosolization on cell viability remain unclear. Likewise, little is known of the resulting cell distribution pattern and how this compares to the density required for epithelialization. The potential benefits of cospraying cells in the presence of fibrin adhesive are equally uncertain. Thus, in the present study we have optimized conditions for the aerosolization of cultured keratinocytes using a device (Tissom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…adhere, but the proliferation capacity seemed poor and the cultures never recovered to reach the cell yield of the other methods even after 14 days of culture. This could be the result of different stresses, presented by Duncan et al [12], as it is likely that the cells sustained at least elongation stress by being smeared across the surface and that this in turn would lead to reduced cellular metabolism and proliferative capacity, which was also described by Harkin et al [11]. The Harvest ® technique gave a cell survival of about 70%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…adhere, but the proliferation capacity seemed poor and the cultures never recovered to reach the cell yield of the other methods even after 14 days of culture. This could be the result of different stresses, presented by Duncan et al [12], as it is likely that the cells sustained at least elongation stress by being smeared across the surface and that this in turn would lead to reduced cellular metabolism and proliferative capacity, which was also described by Harkin et al [11]. The Harvest ® technique gave a cell survival of about 70%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This has long been thought to damage the cells, both by the passing of the spray nozzle and by the high velocity impact on to the wound bed. Harkin et al [11] recently examined the viability of keratinocytes delivered by aerosol, using the Tissomat applicator and found that the viability after transplantation (93.7% at 70 kPa and 90% at 138 kPa) was similar to the viability of the cells just recently detached from the culture dish (94%). When they adjusted the Tissomat applicator to deliver 207 kPa, they showed that fewer cells survived (73.3%), but not significantly so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…observations, data on file]. The sequential fibrinogen and thrombin spray application, which in line with the literature [25] had a limited impact on cell viability in vitro, offers an elegant nontouch approach to evenly deliver the cells to the wounds. Together, the in vitro data and the reported explorative phase II study allow for a rational final product design of HP802-247 to be tested in further clinical studies for its efficacy in wound healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…There is no wastage of the sprayed cells, unlike some of the digitalpressured aerosolised spray which are known to clog up around the nozzle when the cell suspension concentration is too thick. The cell viability was demonstrated to be unaffected with air pressure up to 10 psi [15], with numerous studies demonstrating the viability of the epidermal cells afteraerosolisation [11,15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%