Despite intense, continued interest in global analyses of signaling cascades through mass spectrometry-based studies, the large-scale, systematic production of phosphoproteomics data has been hampered in-part by inefficient fractionation strategies subsequent to phosphopeptide enrichment. Here we explore two novel multidimensional fractionation strategies for analysis of phosphopeptides. In the first technique we utilize aliphatic ion pairing agents to improve retention of phosphopeptides at high pH in the first dimension of a twodimensional RP-RP. The second approach is based on the addition of strong anion exchange as the second dimension in a three-dimensional reversed phase ( Reversible phosphorylation plays a central role in the regulation of normal cell physiology. The strong links between aberrant signaling and human disease, along with the potential for specific inhibition of disrupted kinase activity, continue to drive efforts aimed at systematic and largescale analysis of phosphorylation in cells and tissues. Shortly after introduction of immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) 1 as an enrichment tool prior to mass spectrometry (MS) analysis (1-3), several laboratories demonstrated the feasibility of phosphopeptide identification and quantitation en masse (4 -7). In the ensuing years, despite widespread proliferation of improved and innovative (8 -14) phosphoproteomics methods, the field struggled with low specificity and poor reproducibility within and across protocols and laboratories. These limitations effectively made dynamic range a secondary issue for the majority of studies. Over the past ca. 5 years, the performance of phosphopeptide enrichment protocols and related methods has stabilized; in fact several groups (15-23) have successfully coupled phosphopeptide enrichment with online or offline fractionation schemes to achieve, in some cases, over 10,000 phosphopeptide identifications. Although these strategies provide for larger phosphosite catalogs, closer inspection reveals that the analytical efficiency, as measured by the number of phosphopeptide identifications per microgram of biological lysate consumed, has remained surprisingly consistent at Ï·1-10 phosphopeptides/g across a wide range of sample types (Table I). One explanation is that the physicochemical properties of phosphopeptides render them less amenable to fractionation by commonly used techniques. For example, although the combination of strong cation exchange (SCX) with reversed phase (RP) has been tremendously successful for 1 The abbreviations used are: IMAC, immobilized metal affinity chromatography; AML, Acute Myeloid Leukemia; CAD, collisionally activated dissociation; ESI, electrospray ionization; FDR, False Discovery Rate; FL, FLT3 ligand; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; LC/MS, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry; Lm-OVA, Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes expressing chicken ovalbumin; ITD, internal tandem duplication; MS/MS, mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry; NTA, nitrilotetra...