2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1190-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized pipeline of MuTect and GATK tools to improve the detection of somatic single nucleotide polymorphisms in whole-exome sequencing data

Abstract: BackgroundDetecting somatic mutations in whole exome sequencing data of cancer samples has become a popular approach for profiling cancer development, progression and chemotherapy resistance. Several studies have proposed software packages, filters and parametrizations. However, many research groups reported low concordance among different methods. We aimed to develop a pipeline which detects a wide range of single nucleotide mutations with high validation rates. We combined two standard tools – Genome Analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, alignment was performed with bwa (Burrows‐Wheeler Aligner; Li & Durbin, ) mem algorithm and followed by removing duplicate reads (Picard) and local realignment by Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK; McKenna et al , ). Mutation callers Mutect (do Valle et al , ) and Strelka (Saunders et al , ) were next applied on the recalibrated data for detection of somatic mutations. The presence of single nucleotide variants (SNV) and small insertions and deletions (InDels) in the germ line was excluded by analysis of remission samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, alignment was performed with bwa (Burrows‐Wheeler Aligner; Li & Durbin, ) mem algorithm and followed by removing duplicate reads (Picard) and local realignment by Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK; McKenna et al , ). Mutation callers Mutect (do Valle et al , ) and Strelka (Saunders et al , ) were next applied on the recalibrated data for detection of somatic mutations. The presence of single nucleotide variants (SNV) and small insertions and deletions (InDels) in the germ line was excluded by analysis of remission samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somatic mutations were called with Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) 18 (https://software.broadinstitute. org/gatk/) best practice pipeline and Mutect 19 . Variants were annotated using ANNOVAR 20 (http://www.…”
Section: Somatic Mutation Detecting and Functional Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most labs still manually examine somatic mutation calls with tools like IGV [64] or pileup.js [65] to confirm their accuracy, as in [32] . Whole pipelines have been published that can serve as a model for investigators setting up their own computational programs [66][67][68] . As of 2017, there is no consensus on the most sensitive and specific pipeline.…”
Section: Somatic Mutation Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%