2020
DOI: 10.1002/pds.5095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing identification of resistant hypertension: Computable phenotype development and validation

Abstract: Purpose: Computable phenotypes are constructed to utilize data within the electronic health record (EHR) to identify patients with specific characteristics; a necessary step for researching a complex disease state. We developed computable phenotypes for resistant hypertension (RHTN) and stable controlled hypertension (HTN) based on the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) common data model (CDM). The computable phenotypes were validated through manual chart review. Methods: We adapted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, most other CKD validation studies defined CKD as KDIGO stage 3a or higher (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2) -using this common definition of CKD, our algorithm had a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97%, and was comparable to existing studies with sensitivities ranging from 93 to 100% and specificities ranging from 0 to 99% [8,10,11]. Our algorithm sensitivity and specificity for diabetes [31][32][33], hypertension [34,35], and cardiovascular disease [36,37] also have comparable accuracy to that of previously published studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In contrast, most other CKD validation studies defined CKD as KDIGO stage 3a or higher (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2) -using this common definition of CKD, our algorithm had a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97%, and was comparable to existing studies with sensitivities ranging from 93 to 100% and specificities ranging from 0 to 99% [8,10,11]. Our algorithm sensitivity and specificity for diabetes [31][32][33], hypertension [34,35], and cardiovascular disease [36,37] also have comparable accuracy to that of previously published studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…We used our previously validated computable phenotype algorithms to classify patients as aTRH, stable controlled HTN, or other HTN in the OneFlorida and REACHnet datasets [18]. Briefly, adult patients (≥18 years) with an outpatient HTN diagnosis, prescription records, and BP measurements during the study period were included in the data preparation steps.…”
Section: Atrh and Stable Controlled Htn Computable Phenotype Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, leveraging our validated aTRH computable phenotype algorithm [18], we aimed to identify characteristics and predictors of aTRH within electronic health records (EHRs)-based data of large, racially and ethnically diverse populations from the OneFlorida Data Trust and the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet). We used OneFlorida as a discovery population and REACHnet as a validation cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, researchers may develop computable phenotypes that combine various datatypes (eg, diagnosis codes, text mentions, medications) to increase the specificity and/or sensitivity of the phenotype. 32,33 Ideally, a computable phenotype should be designed with input from both data scientists and clinical experts and within the context of a specific study. A clinical domain expert understands the diagnostic, laboratory, and pharmacological markers for a disease and the specific characteristics that distinguish similar conditions.…”
Section: Computable Phenotypes and Phenotyping Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%