2016
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2015.1086797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing phosphorus use in sustainable maize cropping via mycorrhizal inoculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values recorded for HI in sesame showed that neither mycorrhizal inoculation nor RP fertilization had a significant effect on this parameter (Table 3). This contrasts the finding of Hagh et al (2016), who reported a positive effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on HI under low level of soil P in field grown maize. HI being a measure of crop reproduction efficiency, is influenced by a number of factors.…”
Section: Biometric Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean values recorded for HI in sesame showed that neither mycorrhizal inoculation nor RP fertilization had a significant effect on this parameter (Table 3). This contrasts the finding of Hagh et al (2016), who reported a positive effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on HI under low level of soil P in field grown maize. HI being a measure of crop reproduction efficiency, is influenced by a number of factors.…”
Section: Biometric Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Mean value across treatments, LA of sesame was greater in mycorrhiza inoculated plants than in uninoculated (193.25 cm 2 and 117.24 cm 2 , Table 2) possibly due to an improved growth resulting in a total increase of photosynthetic area. Increased LA due to mycorrhizal inoculation has been corroborated elsewhere in field crops, such as sorghum (Afshar et al, 2014) and maize (Hagh et al, 2016). Mean LA indicated a general increment in treatments of no added P than fertilized with RP (192.57 cm 2 and 136.58 cm 2 ).…”
Section: Biometric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Keeping in view the above confusion that AMF respond well with P application or under deficient P conditions, Davaran-Hagh et al (2016) conducted an experiment to identify at which rate of P application AMF respond well. Among four application rates of P (25, 50, 75 and 100% recommended P) and control, G. intraradices inoculate maize plants showed higher yield and growth at 50% application rate of P. Plant P contents also increased with 50% application rate as compared to other treatments.…”
Section: Amf and Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, maize is more tolerant to low P availability in soil than wheat (Postma and Lynch, 2011). This is ascribed at least in part to the stimulated root hair production (Ma et al, 2001) and mycorrhizal colonization of roots (Hagh et al, 2016) under P deficient conditions, which also enhance Zn and Cu uptake. Decreased mycorrhizal colonization with increased P rates may result in an impaired Zn uptake by maize plants (Kothari et al, 1991).…”
Section: Shoot Micronutrient Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%