2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the Temperature of Hot outlet Air of Vortex Tube using Taguchi Method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An optimization and sensibility analysis were performed in [16], considering the effect of inlet air pressure, hot tube length, hot tube internal diameter, orifice diameter, and nozzle diameter, on hot-outlet air temperature. The Taguchi method was used to optimize the response.…”
Section: Review Of Experimental Work Of Vortex Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimization and sensibility analysis were performed in [16], considering the effect of inlet air pressure, hot tube length, hot tube internal diameter, orifice diameter, and nozzle diameter, on hot-outlet air temperature. The Taguchi method was used to optimize the response.…”
Section: Review Of Experimental Work Of Vortex Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include, ANN (Artificial Neural Network) (Dincer, Tasdemir, Baskaya, & Uysal, 2008;Kocabas, Korkmaz, Sorgucu, & Donmez, 2010;Uluer, Kirmaci, & Atas, 2009;Korkamaz, Gumusel, & Markal, 2012), EVOP (Evolutionary Operations) (Soni & Thomson, 1975) Taguchi and ANOVA(Analysis of Variance) (Pinar, Uluer, & Kırmaci, 2009;Kumar, Padmanabhan, & Sarma, 2014), ODFS (Output Dependent Feature Scaling) ANFIS (Adaptive Network based Fuzzy Information System) (Polat & Kirmaci, 2011), RSM (Roughness Surface Methodology) (Bovand M. , Valipour, Dincer, & Eiamsa-ard, 2014) and MADM (Multiple Attribute Decision Making) . These are the few studies carried out to perform the theoretical optimization of the vortex tubes.…”
Section: Other Related Theoretical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that cone angle, α = 30° leads to 50.60% higher heating performance at the cold flow ratio of 0.75 and provides higher cooling efficiency which is 43.76%. G. S. Kumar et al reported that the best cone angle is 20° [3]. However, S. E. Rafiee et al [2] reported the cone angle, α = 30° is the best cone angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%