1968
DOI: 10.1364/josa.58.000419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the Use of the Criterion Response for the Pupil Light Reflex*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This period was chosen to account for the time (0.6 ± 0.3 s) after light offset for the pupil to reach the peak constriction amplitude in response to the 1 s stimulus pulse [3] and on the grounds that the PIPR is already known to follow the melanopsin spectral nomogram for times ≥ 6 s [13]. To optimise the use of criterion pupil light reflex, Webster et al [23] recommended the selection of large stimulus fields, regions of steep slope on the pupil response versus retinal irradiance curves, and observers with the steepest slopes and lowest noise. Accordingly, we measured the criterion PIPR with a 41° stimulus on two participants who showed the lowest variability among the five participants from our previous study and by using the regions of steep slope (above melanopsin threshold ~11.0 log quanta.cm -2 .s -1 retinal irradiance) from the 6 s PIPR amplitude versus retinal irradiance data (Figure 6 in Adhikari et al [3]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This period was chosen to account for the time (0.6 ± 0.3 s) after light offset for the pupil to reach the peak constriction amplitude in response to the 1 s stimulus pulse [3] and on the grounds that the PIPR is already known to follow the melanopsin spectral nomogram for times ≥ 6 s [13]. To optimise the use of criterion pupil light reflex, Webster et al [23] recommended the selection of large stimulus fields, regions of steep slope on the pupil response versus retinal irradiance curves, and observers with the steepest slopes and lowest noise. Accordingly, we measured the criterion PIPR with a 41° stimulus on two participants who showed the lowest variability among the five participants from our previous study and by using the regions of steep slope (above melanopsin threshold ~11.0 log quanta.cm -2 .s -1 retinal irradiance) from the 6 s PIPR amplitude versus retinal irradiance data (Figure 6 in Adhikari et al [3]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral sensitivity data collected in the present study follows the general procedures set out by Webster and colleagues (1968), which allows for the more rapid assessment of a predetermined pupillary criterion response. In short, the real time measurement of the changes in pupil diameter allows for the use of a modified method of adjustment in which the irradiance necessary to produce a given criterion response at any wavelength of stimuli can quickly be estimated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dementsprechend führt die Vero größerung des Reizfeldes über 60 zu keiner nennenswerten Steigerung der pupillomotorischen Empfindlichkeit (ALEXANDRIDIS, 1970). Es erschien zweckmäßig, großflächige Lichtreize zu verwenden, da die Reproduzierbarkeit der PLR mit der Grüße des stimulierten Gesichtsfeldareales zunimmt (WEBSTER et al 1968 Teil dieser Verlängerung dem Gesichtsfeldausfall (links etwas größer) zuzurechnen ist (BELL und THOMPSON, 1978) und welcher dem ischämischen Prozess, der noch nicht in Atrophie übergegangen ist (HAYREH, 1975), kann nicht unterschieden werden (Abb.27). Bei der Stauungspapille (STP) handelt es sich: Um eine Schwellung im Nervengewebe -ohne weitere Strukturveränderungen -infolge eines erhöhten intrakraniellen Druckes (HAYREH 1968(HAYREH , 1969(HAYREH , 1977, die außer der Kongestion der Gefäße keine weitere akute Blutversorgungsstörung in der Papille, mindestens im primären Stadium, verursacht.…”
Section: Das Von Lowenstein Und Löwenfeld (1958) Eingeführteunclassified