2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3676251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum quantum dot size for highly efficient fluorescence bioimaging

Abstract: Semiconductor quantum dots of few nanometers have demonstrated a great potential for bioimaging. The size determines the emitted color, but it is also expected to play an important role in the image brightness. In this work, the size dependence of the fluorescence quantum yield of the highly thermal sensitive CdTe quantum dots has been systematically investigated by thermal lens spectroscopy. It has been found that an optimum quantum yield is reached for 3.8-nm quantum dots. The presence of this optimum size h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of QD size implies an increase of the surface‐to‐volume ratio and accordingly nonradiative decay rate (τnr1) through the trap‐related states. At the same time, a monotonic increase of the radiative decay rate (τr1) is predicted as the emission frequency increases (i.e., as the QD size decreases), in accord with experimental observations and as predicted by Fermi's Golden Rule. The resulting PL lifetime, determined as τ=(τr1+τnr1)1, for small QDs shows fast radiative and nonradiative decay rates, leading to fast nonexponential decay curves.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The decrease of QD size implies an increase of the surface‐to‐volume ratio and accordingly nonradiative decay rate (τnr1) through the trap‐related states. At the same time, a monotonic increase of the radiative decay rate (τr1) is predicted as the emission frequency increases (i.e., as the QD size decreases), in accord with experimental observations and as predicted by Fermi's Golden Rule. The resulting PL lifetime, determined as τ=(τr1+τnr1)1, for small QDs shows fast radiative and nonradiative decay rates, leading to fast nonexponential decay curves.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Figure d shows the normalized emission spectra of CdTe and CdTe–PNA under CW excitation at 365 nm. For CdTe QDs, the very symmetric emission spectrum indicates that the QDs were well-cooked, while the emission peak position at 569 nm in CdTe QDs agrees well with the size of about 3 nm and our TEM morphology results of CdTe as well. After linking to PNA, the emission peak of CdTe shows a 6 nm blue shift from 569 to 563 nm (Figure d) for the sample with molar ratio 2200:1 of radicals to CdTe.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, only recently, a unity PL QY was reported for CdSe/CdS nanorods excited at 3.057 eV (405 nm), where most of the absorption occurred directly into the shell, thereby demonstrating complete shell-to-core energy transfer . Other research groups, however, noticed an EED of PL QY for CdSe, CdSe/CdS, CdSe/ZnS, CdSe/ZnS/CdSe, CdTe, and InP QDs, particularly a decrease in PL QY for excitation energies above the effective band gap. , Explanations for this observation range from an overestimation of the absorption of the samples at higher energies to surface mediated nonradiative deactivation of the excitons formed upon light absorption. Possible nonradiative decay pathways are the coupling of the charge carriers to the organic ligands on the QD surface as suggested by the Loomis group , or the opening of a continuum of higher energy, nonradiative states, which reduces the efficiency for relaxation of the charge carriers to the band edge as proposed by the Alivisatos group .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%