Option traders use (very) sophisticated heuristics, never the Black–Scholes–Merton formula

Abstract

a b s t r a c tOption traders use a heuristically derived pricing formula which they adapt by fudging and changing the tails and skewness by varying one parameter, the standard deviation of a Gaussian. Such formula is popularly called "Black-Scholes-Merton" owing to an attributed eponymous discovery (though changing the standard deviation parameter is in contradiction with it). However, we have historical evidence that: (1) the said Black, Scholes and Merton did not invent any formula, just found an argument to make a well known (and used) formula compatible with the economics establishment, by removing the "risk" parameter through "dynamic hedging", (2) option traders use (and evidently have used since 1902) sophisticated heuristics and tricks more compatible with the previous versions of the formula of Louis Bachelier and Edward O. Thorp (that allow a broad choice of probability distributions) and removed the risk parameter using put-call parity, (3) option traders did not use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula or similar formulas after 1973 but continued their bottom-up heuristics more robust to the high impact rare event. The paper draws on historical trading methods and 19th and early 20th century references ignored by the finance literature. It is time to stop using the wrong designation for option pricing.

Gekko and black swans: Finance theory in UK undergraduate curricula

“…Moreover, toxic asset holdings were contagiously transferred (Jorion, 2009), through securitisation, from banks that could not even account for the totality of risk they had on their books (as derivatives contracts are subject to choice not to obligation). Haug & Taleb (2011) and Thomsett (2013) critique and discuss how the option traders use sophisticated heuristics that they develop themselves rather than the BlackScholes-Merton formula for derivative trading (taught even though it is based on flawed assumptions and inaccurate variables). Sometimes these assumptions can prevail simply because it is expedient to do so.…”

Economic Science Going Through a Painful Time Confronted with Societal Evolution

“…Ostatně ani redakce renomovaných odborných ekonomických magazínů si občas nepotrpí na publikování názorové plurality. Příkladem může být plných sedm let redakcemi významných ekonomických časo-pisů odmítaný článek [Haug a Taleb, 2011] vyvracející Nobelovou cenou ověnčenou teorii portfolia (v mezičase se článek N. Taleba a E. Hauga stal na Internetu nejstahovanějším příspěvkem).…”

Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics

“…Even before the market crash of 1987 practitioners were sceptical as to the validity of the prices produced by their models (Miyazaki 2007, pp. 409-410;MacKenzie 2008, p. 248;Haug and Taleb 2011) and today the original Black-Scholes equation is used to measure market volatility, a proxy for uncertainty, rather than to 'price' options.…”

“…However since Black Monday in 1987 market practitioners have been more sceptical of the accuracy of the Black-Scholes equation, and as Haug and Taleb (2011) point out, traders rarely use the formula and prefer practical heuristics. In contemporary markets, the prices of standard, exchange traded derivatives are determined by 'the market', while exotic, over-the-counter derivatives are too complex to be priced analytically.…”