2020
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0091-20.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optogenetics: Keep Interpretations Light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This opsin enables a noninvasive light‐induced stimulation of neurons deep within the brain when an optical fiber is placed just above the brain surface, thus, facilitating research in large brain regions or large‐brained animals (Yizhar, Fenno, Prigge, et al., 2011). An important issue associated with optogenetics is postinhibitory rebound firing influencing the clarity of the ultimate effect of opsin activation (Bernard, 2020). Indeed, due to this phenomenon, inhibited cells may exhibit a markedly synchronized firing upon cessation of light activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opsin enables a noninvasive light‐induced stimulation of neurons deep within the brain when an optical fiber is placed just above the brain surface, thus, facilitating research in large brain regions or large‐brained animals (Yizhar, Fenno, Prigge, et al., 2011). An important issue associated with optogenetics is postinhibitory rebound firing influencing the clarity of the ultimate effect of opsin activation (Bernard, 2020). Indeed, due to this phenomenon, inhibited cells may exhibit a markedly synchronized firing upon cessation of light activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether such a mechanism would exactly compensate for the reduction in PV-IN-mediated IPSCs in a slice is debatable and cannot be resolved by using chemogenetic strategies which would potentially suffer from similar network level changes. The inability of optical/chemogenetic silencing to disambiguate direct from circuit-effects need to be considered while using cell-specific silencing strategies (Bernard, 2020). Interestingly, a prior study found limited contribution of PV-INs to action potential independent miniature IPSCs in GCs (Goswami et al, 2012) and mutations impairing PV expression were shown to alter GC evoked IPSCs without impacting sIPSC frequency (Lucas et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as is the case with any newly developed methodology, one must also be wary of the caveats. Recently, Christophe Bernard reviewed some confounding factors that should be taken into account when interpreting optogenetic effects (Bernard, 2020), such as brain dynamics, cell dynamics, possible perturbations by inserted channelrhodopsins, possibility of the light perturbing native proteins and modifications triggered by the viral vectors. We have to always be aware of what this means for data interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%