2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.2007.00342.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral epithelium–Candida glabrata interactions in vitro

Abstract: C. glabrata is less cytotoxic than C. albicans and induces different proinflammatory cytokine responses in oral epithelial cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous dose response studies showed that a maximal GM-CSF response is detected after prolonged incubation at a 0.1:1 C. glabrata- to-epithelial-cell ratio (Li and Dongari-Bagtzoglou, 2007; Li et al ., 2007), and we obtained similar data with strain MRL2302 in this study (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous dose response studies showed that a maximal GM-CSF response is detected after prolonged incubation at a 0.1:1 C. glabrata- to-epithelial-cell ratio (Li and Dongari-Bagtzoglou, 2007; Li et al ., 2007), and we obtained similar data with strain MRL2302 in this study (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that C. glabrata is a potent inducer of granulocyte monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in human oral keratinocytes (Li and Dongari-Bagtzoglou, 2007; Li et al ., 2007), and that strains differ in eliciting GM-CSF responses, with certain oroesophageal candidiasis isolates possessing higher GM-CSF induction capacity than oral commensal isolates (Li and Dongari-Bagtzoglou, 2007). By enhancing the proliferation, activation, as well as fungicidal activity of immuno-effector cells such as neutrophils and monocytes, GM-CSF may play a major role in local control of Candida and the prevention of invasive infection, as suggested in clinical reports (Nicolatou-Galitis et al ., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the proteins found from C. glabrata are involved in transcriptional regulation. It has been suggested that C. glabrata and C. albicans have a “synergistic” relationship in the pathogenesis of oral infection 39 . It may be possible that proteins from C. glabrata have some mechanism of control over expression of inflammatory factors originating from C. albicans species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, another group documented GM-CSF production by oral epithelial cells in response to C. glabrata rather than C. albicans . In the same study, oral epithelial cells were more resistant to killing by C. glabrata compared to C. albicans [117]. Clearly, much remains to be learned on the interaction between epithelial cells and NAC species.…”
Section: Cellular Immunity To Candida Species: the First Line Of Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, C. albicans , C. tropicalis and C. krusei induced IL-1β production by BMDMs, whereas C. glabrata did not [148]. Similarly, C. albicans but not C. glabrata promoted epithelial cell production of IL-8 and IL-1α [117]. However, several studies suggest that C. glabrata may favor GM-CSF production, as this NAC species induced production of GM-CSF by both epithelial cells and BMDMs in vitro [101, 117].…”
Section: Antifungal Mechanisms: Soluble Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%