Oral health‐related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant‐supported dental prostheses

Duong, Ho-Yan; Roccuzzo, Andrea; Stähli, Alexandra; Salvi, Giovanni E.; Lang, Niklaus P.; Sculean, Anton

doi:10.1111/prd.12419

Cited by 122 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 88 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, reimplantation was commonly associated with ridge augmentation or sinus grafting procedures. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] When reconsidering the treatment plan following implant loss, it is apparent that implant therapy may not necessarily improve oral health-related quality of life relative to conventional restorations, as critically appraised in the review paper by Duong et al 50…”

Section: Impl Ant Removal and Prepar Ati On Of The " Ne X T Round"mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

It is all about peri‐implant tissue health

Schwarz

Ramanauskaitė

2022

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current treatment protocols for the rehabilitation of partially and fully edentulous patients by means of implant-supported restorations are associated with high survival rates, thus representing a predictable alternative to conventional concepts. 1,2 Though survival is a robust outcome to assess the fundamental basis for implant function, it clearly ignores the biological and esthetic status of the surrounding tissues. Similar limitations are also related to the survival assessment of implant-supported prostheses, which in turn do not account for prosthetic complications.Consequently, the term "survival" has been supplemented with "success" to allow for a more holistic definition of outcomes in implant dentistry and a more objective assessment on whether implant-supported restorations are within a predefined range of relevant clinical and radiographic outcome measures. The definition of "implant success" has evolved over the years and was ultimately refined during the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions by the characterization of peri-implant health. 3,4 Healthy peri-implant tissues have become synonymous with implant success. This is clinically determined by the "absence of erythema, bleeding on probing, swelling and suppuration," without considering a specific range of probing depths.

show abstract

Section: Impl Ant Removal and Prepar Ati On Of The " Ne X T Round"mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When reconsidering the treatment plan following implant loss, it is apparent that implant therapy may not necessarily improve oral health–related quality of life relative to conventional restorations, as critically appraised in the review paper by Duong et al 50 …”

Section: Implant Removal and Preparation Of The “Next Round”mentioning

confidence: 99%

It is all about peri‐implant tissue health

Schwarz

Ramanauskaitė

2022

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, the changing demographics and aging of the population have increased the proportion of patients aged over 70 years who have medically multi-morbid disease involvement [54]. This has a direct impact on dentistry as well, and especially on the discipline of reconstructive dentistry: (1) tooth loss occurs at higher ages resulting in more complex prosthetic treatment; (2) older individuals have worse acceptance of (removable) prostheses; and (3) there is a higher risk of supplementary implants in medically compromised patients [55,56]. For these reasons, it is obvious that networking with general medicine, and in particular with geriatrics, will become increasingly important for the prosthodontist in the future to deliver personalized workflows in reconstructive dentistry.…”

Section: Demographic Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalized workflows in reconstructive dentistry—current possibilities and future opportunities

Joda

Zitzmann

2022

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The increasing collection of health data coupled with continuous IT advances have enabled precision medicine with personalized workflows. Traditionally, dentistry has lagged behind general medicine in the integration of new technologies: So what is the status quo of precision dentistry? The primary focus of this review is to provide a current overview of personalized workflows in the discipline of reconstructive dentistry (prosthodontics) and to highlight the disruptive potential of novel technologies for dentistry; the possible impact on society is also critically discussed. Material and methods Narrative literature review. Results Narrative literature review. Conclusions In the near future, artificial intelligence (AI) will increase diagnostic accuracy, simplify treatment planning, and thus contribute to the development of personalized reconstructive workflows by analyzing e-health data to promote decision-making on an individual patient basis. Dental education will also benefit from AI systems for personalized curricula considering the individual students’ skills. Augmented reality (AR) will facilitate communication with patients and improve clinical workflows through the use of visually guided protocols. Tele-dentistry will enable opportunities for remote contact among dental professionals and facilitate remote patient consultations and post-treatment follow-up using digital devices. Finally, a personalized digital dental passport encoded using blockchain technology could enable prosthetic rehabilitation using 3D-printed dental biomaterials. Clinical significance Overall, AI can be seen as the door-opener and driving force for the evolution from evidence-based prosthodontics to personalized reconstructive dentistry encompassing a synoptic approach with prosthetic and implant workflows. Nevertheless, ethical concerns need to be solved and international guidelines for data management and computing power must be established prior to a widespread routine implementation.

show abstract

“…As gold alloy has the longest history of use in metalceramic constructions, most long-term studies investigate gold alloy [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. A survey conducted among prosthodontists showed that the most used material for tooth-supported short-and long-span fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) is porcelain-veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A retrospective clinical study of fixed tooth- and implant-supported prostheses in titanium and cobalt-chromium-ceramic: 5–9-year follow-up

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of fixed tooth- and implant-supported protheses manufactured in porcelain veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) or titanium with a follow-up period of 5–9 years. Materials and methods This study included 63 patients with a total of 86 fixed dental protheses (FDPs) (53 implant-supported and 33 tooth-supported). In total, 67 were short-span FDPs (3–5 units) and 19 were long-span FDPs (6–12 units). The FDPs were evaluated using a modified version of the California Dental Association (CDA). Results The binary regression analysis indicated that neither CoCr nor titanium had a statistically significant effect on the odds of success or survival of either tooth- or implant-supported FDPs. However, the success of FDPs was negatively affected by greater FDP length and general tooth wear. The survival of FDPs was negatively affected by increased FDP longevity. Conclusions This study found no statistically significant effect on the odds of success and survival outcomes for any combination of tooth-supported, implant-supported, porcelain-veneered CoCr, or porcelain-veneered titanium FDPs. As the number of FDPs was limited, the results should be interpreted with caution. Clinical relevance This study shows that the choice between CoCr porcelain and titanium porcelain in fixed protheses did not have a statistically significant effect on the outcome.

show abstract

Oral health‐related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant‐supported dental prostheses

Abstract: Oral health-related quality of life is an established and relevant instrument with which to describe patient satisfaction. It was developed with a psychometric and social survey background and encompasses multiple dimensions of life, ranging from impairment

Cited by 122 publications

References 88 publications

It is all about peri‐implant tissue health

It is all about peri‐implant tissue health

Personalized workflows in reconstructive dentistry—current possibilities and future opportunities

A retrospective clinical study of fixed tooth- and implant-supported prostheses in titanium and cobalt-chromium-ceramic: 5–9-year follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About