2011
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Health: Validation of a questionnaire of self-perception and self-care habits in Diabetes Mellitus 2, hypertensive and obese patients. The UISESS-B scale

Abstract: Objectives: To develop and to evaluate a questionnaire of self-perception and self-care habits on oral health on a first level population. Methods: A descriptive� observational stud� �as perfor�ed to validate a questionnaire on oral health self-percep-: A descriptive� observational stud� �as perfor�ed to validate a questionnaire on oral health self-percep-A descriptive� observational stud� �as perfor�ed to validate a questionnaire on oral health self-perception (UISESS-B). After non-probabilistic sa�pling� 94 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the findings from the seven experts, the scale content validity index (S‐CVI) of this tool was found to be over 90%, which was considered acceptable for a newly developed instrument. These results were in line with findings from other studies that assessed the psychometric properties of questionnaires developed for use in a survey, with a CVI above 80%, which has been accepted as the minimum limit for a new instrument 32‐36 . In addition, Guimaraes et al, 8 who developed and validated an assessment tool for mechanically ventilated patients, showed that the CVI implementation for each indicator item was 86% of the agreement on the five indicators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the findings from the seven experts, the scale content validity index (S‐CVI) of this tool was found to be over 90%, which was considered acceptable for a newly developed instrument. These results were in line with findings from other studies that assessed the psychometric properties of questionnaires developed for use in a survey, with a CVI above 80%, which has been accepted as the minimum limit for a new instrument 32‐36 . In addition, Guimaraes et al, 8 who developed and validated an assessment tool for mechanically ventilated patients, showed that the CVI implementation for each indicator item was 86% of the agreement on the five indicators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results were in line with findings from other studies that assessed the psychometric properties of questionnaires developed for use in a survey, with a CVI above 80%, which has been accepted as the minimum limit for a new instrument. [32][33][34][35][36] In addition, Guimaraes et al, 8 who developed and validated an assessment tool for mechanically ventilated patients, showed that the CVI implementation for each indicator item was 86% of the agreement on the five indicators. This indicates the validity of this content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model's scale content validity index (S-CVI) was over 90% in the current study, which is acceptable for a newly developed instrument. These results were in line with findings from other studies that assessed the psychometric properties of questionnaires designed for use in a survey, with a CVI above 80% 30,31. On the other hand, our rating for face validity was similar to other findings 32…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The UISESS-B scale was developed to evaluate self-care habits and self-perception of oral health for patients with chronic diseases including diabetes mellitus (Salcedo-Rocha, Garcia-de-Alba-Garcia, Velasquez-Herrera, & Barba-Gonzalez, 2011). The UISESS-B consists of two parts: oral health habits (hygiene, food/feeding, and care/protection) and oral health status self-perception (mouth and teeth signs and symptoms), with 35 items rated on 3-point Likert-type scale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%