2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbee5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital Foregrounds for Ultra-short Duration Transients

Abstract: Reflections from objects in Earth orbit can produce subsecond, star-like optical flashes similar to astrophysical transients. Reflections have historically caused false alarms for transient surveys, but the population has not been systematically studied. We report event rates for these orbital flashes using the Evryscope Fast Transient Engine, a low-latency transient detection pipeline for the Evryscopes. We select single-epoch detections likely caused by Earth satellites and model the event rate as a function… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this image, the peak brightness of the flash from the satellite corresponds to a magnitude of V ∼ 5. Corbett et al (2020) characterise the occurrence of flashes from satellites and measure a peak rate of 1 800± 600 280 per h per sky near the equator, at a peak magnitude of 6.8, assuming a flash duration of 0.4 s. This duration is comparable to what we have observed in Figure 4. The subsequent processing steps described in Paper I, determining the astrometry and photometry, need only be performed for any astronomical candidates subsequently confirmed to be high confidence candidates, after a detailed examination of the potential match.…”
Section: Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In this image, the peak brightness of the flash from the satellite corresponds to a magnitude of V ∼ 5. Corbett et al (2020) characterise the occurrence of flashes from satellites and measure a peak rate of 1 800± 600 280 per h per sky near the equator, at a peak magnitude of 6.8, assuming a flash duration of 0.4 s. This duration is comparable to what we have observed in Figure 4. The subsequent processing steps described in Paper I, determining the astrometry and photometry, need only be performed for any astronomical candidates subsequently confirmed to be high confidence candidates, after a detailed examination of the potential match.…”
Section: Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Evryscope light curves of dim stars (g =15) reach comparable precision to TESS, attaining 10% photometric precision (Ratzloff et al 2019). In between light curve database updates, we may query light curves of individual sources not in the standard database at high computational cost using a separate Evryscope pipeline, Evryscope Fast Transient Engine (EFTE; Corbett et al 2020). The photometric performance and stability of the EFTE light curves is comparable to light curves from the standard pipeline.…”
Section: Evryscope Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photometric performance and stability of the EFTE light curves is comparable to light curves from the standard pipeline. More details on the EFTE pipeline are found in Corbett et al (2020). We use light curves from both the standard and EFTE pipelines, which are tracked in the machinereadable version of Table 1.…”
Section: Evryscope Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this image, the peak brightness of the flash from the satellite corresponds to a magnitude of V∼5. Corbett et al (2020) characterise the occurrence of flashes from satellites and measure a peak rate of 1800± 600 280 per hour per sky near the equator, at a peak magnitude of 6.8, assuming a flash duration of 0.4 seconds. This duration is comparable to what we have observed in Figure 4.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%