2008
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/82/37001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital magnetism in transition metal systems: The role of local correlation effects

Abstract: The influence of correlation effects on the orbital moments for transition metals and their alloys is studied by first-principle relativistic Density Functional Theory in combination with the Dynamical Mean-Field Theory. In contrast to the previous studies based on the orbital polarization corrections we obtain an improved description of the orbital moments for wide range of studied systems as bulk Fe, Co and Ni, Fe-Co disordered alloys and 3d impurities in Au. The proposed scheme can give simultaneously a cor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Fe, the adopted U value is within the experimental value U ∼ 1 eV 32 and a value U ∼ 2 eV derived from theoretical studies. 68,69 In the case of Co and Ni the U values are in agreement with previous theoretical and experimental investigations. 24 Because the screening of the exchange interaction is usually small, the averaged on-site interaction J is generally accepted to coincide with its atomic value which is approximately equal to J ∼ 0.9 eV for all 3d elements and can be directly calculated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For Fe, the adopted U value is within the experimental value U ∼ 1 eV 32 and a value U ∼ 2 eV derived from theoretical studies. 68,69 In the case of Co and Ni the U values are in agreement with previous theoretical and experimental investigations. 24 Because the screening of the exchange interaction is usually small, the averaged on-site interaction J is generally accepted to coincide with its atomic value which is approximately equal to J ∼ 0.9 eV for all 3d elements and can be directly calculated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Hubbard U was set to 1.5 eV and 2.5 eV for Fe 2 B and Co 2 B, respectively, and the Hund's exchange J to 0.8 eV and 0.9 eV, respectively. These values of U are chosen since values in the range 1-3 eV are commonly used for metallic Fe and Co while using a somewhat larger value for Co than for Fe has been shown to yield a good description of the orbital magnetism in these elements [65]. The around mean field approximation was used for the double-counting correction.…”
Section: Electron Correlations In Fe 2 B and Co 2 B Within Dmftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the variation should be small, i.e., see Ref. [33] for cobalt, thus, we do not expect that this difference influences our results significantly. The on-site uniaxial magnetic anisotropies used in this work are k u (Co) = 3.73 × 10 −23 J/atom and k u (Tb) = 2.16 × 10 −22 J/atom.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To model the properties of TbCo we have used the following material parameters: damping constant λ = 0.05 for both materials, and magnetic moments μ Co = 1.61μ B [33] and μ Tb = 9.34μ B [34]. The selected magnetic moment values for our simulations are the corresponding bulk values for Co and Tb.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%