“…The alloplastic materials are those receiving the best credit by ophthalmic surgeons, and there are many of them. Gelfilm Ò (Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, Ml), Medpor Ò (Porex Surgical Inc. College Park, Ga), Silastic Ò (Dow Corning, Auburn, MI), Teflon Ò (DuPont DeNemours and Co, Wilmington, Del), methylmethacrylate, polyamide, titanium, vitallium, Marlex Ò (Phillips Chemical Co, Houston, Tex), hydroxyapatite, ceramics and BAG-implant [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] are only some among the most famous; the main disadvantages are represented by long-term infections which may lead to the removal of the implant, its extrusion or migration, foreign-body reactions and encapsulation (the latter occurrence often gives a false sense of security to the surgeon). Beside these contraindications of generic type, several authors noticed that some of these materials are inflammable (PTFE), develop excessive heat (methylmethacrylate), or are very difficult to remove in case of adverse reaction (titanium and vitallium).…”