2014
DOI: 10.15611/ie.2014.3.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orchestration of distributed hetero-geneous sensor networks and Internet of Things

Abstract: This paper focuses on management of sensor networks and Internet of Things. Two alternative architectures for service management in IoT and sensor networks are analyzed. The first one is based on Open Service Gateway (OSGi) framework and Remote Services for OSGi (R-OSGi) bundle. The second one extends Representational State Transfer (REST) paradigm. The analysis confirms that these two architectures meet the requirements of both sensor networks and IoT management. However, to bypass the disadvantages of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some works solve the orchestration of IIoT networks without SDN, like in [6], where an IoT network is orchestrated by a network of fog nodes, which manage all layers of an IoT ecosystem to integrate different service modules into a complex topology. In [7] two architectures for an IoT networks orchestration are presented, using OSGi (https://www.osgi.org) and REST (https://restfulapi.net/), paying attention only to higher layers, not to physical connection. Moreover, universal standards for IoT like oneM2M are not taken into account, missing interoperability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works solve the orchestration of IIoT networks without SDN, like in [6], where an IoT network is orchestrated by a network of fog nodes, which manage all layers of an IoT ecosystem to integrate different service modules into a complex topology. In [7] two architectures for an IoT networks orchestration are presented, using OSGi (https://www.osgi.org) and REST (https://restfulapi.net/), paying attention only to higher layers, not to physical connection. Moreover, universal standards for IoT like oneM2M are not taken into account, missing interoperability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems evident that this scenario requires a software architecture that allows the control of the entire network in a single entity, centralizing data processing, applications, and decision making, which in telecommunications networks is defined as "decoupling the control plane from the data plane". This is possible using a Software Defined Networking (SDN) architecture [Wilusz14], [Bizanis16], [Jeschke16].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Wilusz14] two architectures for an IoT networks orchestration are presented, using OSGi [OSGi] and REST [REST], paying attention only to higher layers, not to physical connection. Moreover, universal standards for IoT like oneM2M are not taken into account, missing interoperability.…”
Section: Chapter 3 Planning and Deployment Of Key Enabling Technologmentioning
confidence: 99%