2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Order aggressiveness and quantity: How are they determined in a limit order market?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hall and Hautsch [10] observe an increase of all kinds of order submission during periods of high volatility. Ranaldo [18] supports an inverse relation between order aggression and volatility, while Lo and Sapp [14] report a positive relationship between order aggression and volatility. Cao et al [3] find that volatility has a minimal effect on order aggression.…”
Section: Information Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hall and Hautsch [10] observe an increase of all kinds of order submission during periods of high volatility. Ranaldo [18] supports an inverse relation between order aggression and volatility, while Lo and Sapp [14] report a positive relationship between order aggression and volatility. Cao et al [3] find that volatility has a minimal effect on order aggression.…”
Section: Information Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For limit orders, both the execution risk and adverse selection risk increases with the ordered quantity, since that a large-sized order may not be executed entirely and a large loss may occur when the value of underling stock changes. Lo and Sapp (2007) provide an empirical study of the joint nature of order price and quantity in the limit order market and they find a significantly negative relationship between price aggressiveness and order size through explicitly examining the trade-offs between these two dimensions, conditioning on the state of the limit order book. They offer two explanations why more aggressive orders are smaller: order splitting or order consolidating (Lo and Sapp, 2007, p.14).…”
Section: Order Submission Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, traders may strategically split large orders to reduce price impact. Lo and Sapp (2007) test the autocorrelation of market orders and aggressive limit orders, and their findings suggest that dealers split their orders to either hide their information or to decrease the execution costs. Second, if certain market participants can observe the orders of others whom they believe to be informed, then they may imitate their orders.…”
Section: Order Submission Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations