2020
DOI: 10.1037/aca0000224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Order, complexity, and aesthetic appreciation.

Abstract: Which stimulus and person characteristics determine aesthetic appreciation? For many centuries, philosophers and scientists have been trying to solve this complex puzzle. Through the ages, order, complexity, and the balance between order and complexity have frequently been considered as an answer to this question. The literature on the topic, however, both theoretically and empirically speaking, is rather diffuse and contradictory. In this review, we give an overview of the main theories and empirical findings… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
105
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(300 reference statements)
7
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerically largest correlation, though, occurred for the multiple-element pictures, which makes sense, because balancing should play some role if a medium number of elements are present in a picture. These findings are in line with the principle of unity-in-variety (Fechner, 1876) and the related idea that complexity must go along with order for aesthetic appreciation (Van Geert & Wagemans, 2019). Accordingly, balance affects liking only when an image is sufficiently complex, which, in our case, is the case for dynamic-pattern and multiple-element pictures, but not for single-element pictures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The numerically largest correlation, though, occurred for the multiple-element pictures, which makes sense, because balancing should play some role if a medium number of elements are present in a picture. These findings are in line with the principle of unity-in-variety (Fechner, 1876) and the related idea that complexity must go along with order for aesthetic appreciation (Van Geert & Wagemans, 2019). Accordingly, balance affects liking only when an image is sufficiently complex, which, in our case, is the case for dynamic-pattern and multiple-element pictures, but not for single-element pictures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, we used the rating dimension complex , which depends primarily on the number and/or density of pictorial elements in an image (Van Geert & Wagemans, 2019). In the present study, we manipulated Line Number as this changes objective complexity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxically, although curved lines display more orientations that angular (straight) lines, they can be perceived as less complex (Bertamini et al., 2019). The relation between subjective and objective complexity is thus not straightforward and can depend on other stimulus factors, for example, symmetry (Gartus & Leder, 2017) or other factors that reflect order (Van Geert & Wagemans, 2019). By contrast, the effect of objective complexity (as an independent variable) on liking has been studied in more detail, but with heterogeneous results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to characterize the image complexity, the following four image complexity metrics [ 26 ] were calculated from the RGB images used in the experiments: Self-similarity: by using the histogram intersection kernel and comparing the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) features of each sub-image at level 3 with those of the entire image at level 0; Complexity: computed as the mean norm of the gradient across all orientations over the gradient image; Birkhoff-like metric: computed as the ratio between the self-similarity and complexity metrics; Anisotropy: calculated as the variance of all the HOG values at level 3. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%