2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.90.144505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordered and Disordered Patterns in Two-Phase Flows in Microchannels

Abstract: We show that wetting properties crucially control the patterns in two-phase flows of immiscible fluids in microchannels. Ordered patterns, continuously entrained by the flow, are obtained when one phase completely wets the walls, while disordered patterns, intermittently adhering to the channel walls, are unavoidably produced when wetting is partial. A lower limit for the channel sizes capable of generating well structured objects (drops, pears, pearl necklaces, ...) is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
276
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
276
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ͑6͒, the surface tension pressure jump across the interface has been taken into account in spite that, for the typical values of the different variables in our experiments Ca Ϫ1 /␣ b ՇO(0.1). As an important consequence, bubble formation is not controlled by surface tension as in other related experiments, 15 where the wetting properties of the liquids and materials used affect the stability of the flow patterns obtained. In the subsequent analysis, we will neglect surface tension pressure drop.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In ͑6͒, the surface tension pressure jump across the interface has been taken into account in spite that, for the typical values of the different variables in our experiments Ca Ϫ1 /␣ b ՇO(0.1). As an important consequence, bubble formation is not controlled by surface tension as in other related experiments, 15 where the wetting properties of the liquids and materials used affect the stability of the flow patterns obtained. In the subsequent analysis, we will neglect surface tension pressure drop.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Most commonly used microemulsification devices include T-junctions (Christopher and Anna 2007;Dreyfus et al 2003;Link et al 2004;Nisisako et al 2002;Thorsen et al 2001;Garstecki et al 2006), flow-focusing devices (Anna et al 2003;Ganan-Calvo 1998;Ganan-Calvo and Gordillo 2001;Xu and Nakajima 2004;Garstecki et al 2004), and devices in which liquid threads break on the terraces of microchannels (Sugiura et al 2001(Sugiura et al , 2002a. Since the generation of droplets with a predictable and reproducible size and size distribution determines their potential applications (including the synthesis of polymer colloids), several research groups have explored various aspects of the process of emulsification (Seo et al 2005a;Xu et al 2005;Zhang et al 2006;Cygan et al 2005;El-Ali et al 2005;Garstecki et al 2005a;Hudson et al 2005;Jensen and Lee 2004;Khan et al 2004;Song et al 2003;Zheng and Ismagilov 2005;Zheng et al 2003) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a drop may be formed with a known composition and volume [5,6,7] and transported by an inert fluid without loss of the solute species and without cross-contamination [8]. Furthermore, fusion of two drops containing two reactive species leads to the onset, on demand, of a reaction [9] whose product may be sampled by breaking the drop at a bifurcation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%