2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordered mesoporous silica particles and Si-MCM-41 for the adsorption of acetone: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mesoporous V-Ti/MCM-41 catalysts were prepared by a hydrothermal method, which was based on a procedure described by Hung et al [36], using the following general gel composition (molar ratios) 1 SiO2: 0.2 CTAB: 0.89 H2SO4: 120 H2O. In our research, we named each catalyst with different metal loading weight ratios (V-Ti-Si), such as (2-0-100), (1-1-100), (0.25-2-100), (0.05-4-100), (0-5-100).…”
Section: Preparation Of Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesoporous V-Ti/MCM-41 catalysts were prepared by a hydrothermal method, which was based on a procedure described by Hung et al [36], using the following general gel composition (molar ratios) 1 SiO2: 0.2 CTAB: 0.89 H2SO4: 120 H2O. In our research, we named each catalyst with different metal loading weight ratios (V-Ti-Si), such as (2-0-100), (1-1-100), (0.25-2-100), (0.05-4-100), (0-5-100).…”
Section: Preparation Of Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this aspect, research studies on adsorptive removal of various VOCs over MCM-41, SBA-15, and MCM-48 have been reported (Serrano et al, 2004;Dou et al, 2011). Hung et al (2009) investigated the adsorption behaviors of acetone vapors over MCM-41 and ZSM-5 zeolite. It was demonstrated that MCM-41 revealed better adsorption capability and regeneration ability in comparison to the ZSM-5 zeolite, an adsorbent used in commercialized zeolite rotor concentrators (Lin et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VOCs abatement techniques can be divided into two categories, i.e., destructive (thermal, catalytic, and photocatalytic oxidation, bio-filtration) and recuperative (adsorption, absorption, condensation, membrane separation) [1,8,9]. Adsorption onto porous materials is a well-established, highly selective, energy efficient, and relatively inexpensive technique employed for the removal and recovery of VOCs from air, especially at a low concentration [1,3,5,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Porous materials having large specific surface area and pore volume, including activated carbon and its derivatives [1][2][3][4]6,10,14,16,[19][20][21][22], alumina [18], natural clay [18], natural and modified zeolites [11,[23][24][25][26], are the most frequently applied adsorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the selection of adsorbents with high adsorption and desorption performances is an important task. Various neat and hybrid adsorbents, e.g., silica-based materials [11,26,28], organic clay heterostructures [13], metal-organic frameworks (MOF) and MOF-based composites [15,17], hypercrosslinked polymeric resins [5,12], vegetable cellulose [30], have been tested for removal and recovery of VOC species from polluted air streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%