2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Øresund and Fehmarnbelt high-capacity rail corridor standards updated

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cubic and tonnage capacity per train, together with higher average speed (may mean lower requirement of rolling stock for a certain amount of transport needs) drive both efficiency and higher capacity utilisation, since high fixed capital or 'personnel' costs per train contribute significantly to reducing the operational cost of a service. For the railway system as a whole, the loading capacity per train, multiplied by train frequency, determines the overall system transportation capacity [4]. Moreover, the loading capacity per train can be linked to axle load.…”
Section: System Capacity Utilisation and Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cubic and tonnage capacity per train, together with higher average speed (may mean lower requirement of rolling stock for a certain amount of transport needs) drive both efficiency and higher capacity utilisation, since high fixed capital or 'personnel' costs per train contribute significantly to reducing the operational cost of a service. For the railway system as a whole, the loading capacity per train, multiplied by train frequency, determines the overall system transportation capacity [4]. Moreover, the loading capacity per train can be linked to axle load.…”
Section: System Capacity Utilisation and Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boysen (2012) proposed a general rail capacity model, with parameters to take account of both weight and volume characteristics of freight trains given that load capacity per train is a critical component of system capacity. Within the context of the development of the high-capacity German-Scandinavian rail corridor, the capacity per train was then modelled for different sets of infrastructure standards and large potential improvements in load capacity were identified (Boysen, 2014). The relationship between the theoretical and actual capacity per train, and the extent to which the latter varies, features rarely in the literature.…”
Section: Rail System Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention is increasingly given to the operation of freight trains with higher axle loads of 22.5 tonnes in general (Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies, 2014a) and up to 30 tonnes for specific cases e.g. bulk traffic (Boysen, 2013;Mortimer & Islam, 2014). This is not a widespread upper bound but has implications for track and structure strength to accommodate this weight level on a routine basis (Boysen, 2012a;Hilmola, 2008;Jackson et al, 2014).…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is anticipated that there will be fleet management models and operations planning to maximise load factor and thus higher revenue (e.g. fewer wagons used much more intensively, reducing empty running) (Boysen, 2012a(Boysen, , 2014Marinov et al, 2013;Woroniuk, Marinov, Zunder, & Mortimer, 2013). This is likely to require significant changes in the measures of productivity and key performance indicators (KPIs) (e.g.…”
Section: Operationalmentioning
confidence: 99%