Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management 2004
DOI: 10.1061/40737(2004)416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic Carbon Concentrations in Hyporheic Zone Sediments: A Tool for Measuring Stream Integrity

Abstract: Effects of channel incision on sand-bed stream carbon reservoirs were examined. Channel incision may deplete hyporheic zone C stores due to bed erosion, less frequent hydrologic exchanges between stream and floodplain, and paucity of riparian vegetation and large woody debris. Presented are organic C concentrations found in hyporheic sediments before and after an incised stream rehabilitation project and in three adjacent streams in northern Mississippi. The sampled streams comprise a spectrum of physical cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retention rates for smaller organic particles were also low. The total carbon (assumed to be equal to total organic carbon because of the pH regime) of bed sediments averaged 0.13 ± 0.08% prior to rehabilitation, which was comparable to means of ~0.25% for relatively less disturbed streams in the same region (Stofleth et al 2004). …”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Retention rates for smaller organic particles were also low. The total carbon (assumed to be equal to total organic carbon because of the pH regime) of bed sediments averaged 0.13 ± 0.08% prior to rehabilitation, which was comparable to means of ~0.25% for relatively less disturbed streams in the same region (Stofleth et al 2004). …”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 94%
“…10). By 3 yr after rehabilitation, streambed carbon levels were not significantly http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art54/ different from those measured before rehabilitation (p < 0.05; Stofleth et al 2004). Palmer et al (2005) proposed five criteria with which to assess the success of a stream ecosystem restoration project: (1) the design should be based on a specified guiding image of a more dynamic, healthy river that could exist at the site; (2) the ecological condition must be measurably improved; (3) only minimal follow-up maintenance should be needed, i.e., the project should be self-sustaining; (4) no lasting harm should be inflicted on the ecosystem during construction; and (5) both pre and post assessment must be completed and the data made available to the public.…”
Section: Longer-term Failuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4, but without data from the hyporheic zone, it is impossible to assess the effects on the hyporheos or subsurface processes. Another experimental study on woody debris reintroduction in sand-bed streams in northern Mississippi assessed carbon concentrations in hyporheic sediments before and after installation of wood structures into the stream channels but did not find any significant changes after 3 years (Stofleth, Shields & Fox, 2004). Similarly, although constructed riffles and steps were successful in inducing hyporheic water exchange in several agricultural and urban streams in southern Ontario, Canada, dissolved oxygen concentrations were rapidly depleted with depth (Kasahara & Hill, 2006a).…”
Section: Human Impacts On the Hyporheos And Potential Rehabilitation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass per unit mass concentrations of total C within this data set ranged from near detection limits (0.01%) to as much as 2%, but isolated values in the order of 10% were reported for different reaches of the same streams by Stofleth et al, (2004). Observations of stream-bed organic carbon (OC) concentration (mass percentage) reported by others vary roughly between 0.1% and 10% (Table 9), and some differences are likely owing to variation in analytical methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%