2017
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1371796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic loading rate effect on the acidogenesis of cheese whey: a comparison between UASB and SBR reactors

Abstract: Volatile fatty acids (VFA) production and degree of acidification (DA) were investigated in the anaerobic treatment of cheese whey by comparison of two processes: a continuous process using a laboratory upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a discontinuous process using a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). The main purpose of this work was to study the organic loading rate (OLR) effect on the yield of VFA in two kinds of reactors. The predominant products in the acidogenic process in both reactors we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SBR showed a good performance in comparison with other types of reactors, considering the lactose degradation rate, the VFA production rate obtained and microbial populations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The SBR showed a good performance in comparison with other types of reactors, considering the lactose degradation rate, the VFA production rate obtained and microbial populations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang and Yu observed a maximum rate of 0.18 g COD g VSS −1 h −1 in an upflow reactor. According to the literature, the difference in kinetic results depends on factors such as reactor configuration, microbial population and type of wastewater …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acidification is intensified due to the low bicarbonate alkalinity in cheese whey (∼50 meq/L) (Mockaitis et al, 2006;Gannoun et al, 2008;Diamantis et al, 2014). These aspects exert a negative impact on methanogenesis; because methanogenic archaea are sensitive to low pH environments, and develop better within a range of 6.5-8.2 (Calero et al, 2018b). Another consequence is the loss of the inoculum, due to the difficulty of forming granular sludge (Kalyuzhnyi et al, 1997;Carvalho et al, 2013), generating effluents with a high content of suspended solids, consequently reducing treatment effectiveness (Diamantis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%