2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11301-009-0054-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisationales Commitment und seine Einflussfaktoren: Eine qualitative Metaanalyse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies in the nursing home setting (Karsh et al, 2005; Takase, 2010), our findings indicate that high affective organizational commitment is significantly linked with decreased intention to leave (Westphal & Gmür, 2009). One possible explanation could be that high affective organizational commitment accompanies trust in the organization, satisfaction with management and superior behavior, leading to increasingly close affiliation with the organization and increasing self-esteem and in turn to less intention to leave (Westphal & Gmür, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar to previous studies in the nursing home setting (Karsh et al, 2005; Takase, 2010), our findings indicate that high affective organizational commitment is significantly linked with decreased intention to leave (Westphal & Gmür, 2009). One possible explanation could be that high affective organizational commitment accompanies trust in the organization, satisfaction with management and superior behavior, leading to increasingly close affiliation with the organization and increasing self-esteem and in turn to less intention to leave (Westphal & Gmür, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to Meyer and Allen [ 17 ], these can be broken down into three categories: Demographic characteristics or personal dispositions of an employee (personal characteristics), work-related factors an employee experiences during his or her work (work experiences), and characteristics of the organization in which he or she is working (organizational structures). The latter two can be differentiated by whether the factor influences one particular employee (work experiences) or all employees (organizational structure) within an organization [ 18 ]. However, studies examining antecedents of organizational commitment in hospitals tend to focus on only one level of analysis, rather than explaining the effect through variables at both the individual and the organizational level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conceptual background of this paper, we first explain the rationale of using affective organizational commitment as a dependent variable; we subsequently draw upon existing research on antecedents as potential drivers of commitment. Therefore, we make use of the basic differentiation in literature between work experiences at individual and organizational structures at organizational level [ 17 , 18 ]. Finally, we describe the rationale why these associations might differ across the occupational groups of physicians and nurses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It describes every employee's attachment to the company. This bond supports both the reduction of employee turn over and the increase of employee motivation to provide outstanding services for the company (Westphal and Gmür, 2009). According to Moser (1997), commitment describes an action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As many literature reviews have shown, commitment correlates with work outcomes" (Riketta and Dick, 2009, p. 69). Increased commitment appears when the employee remains loyal to the company even in difficult times; hence, employee turnover decreases, and employees take fewer sick days (Westphal and Gmür, 2009). Work performance means that the employee is willing to perform extra work and advocates for the wellbeing of other employees (Mowday et al, 1979).…”
Section: Organizational Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%