2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
143
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-exploration of new knowledge in decentralized networks is the mutual objective of actors, assisted by innovation intermediaries, and by co-innovation within defined geographical clusters (Valkokari, 2015). Having said that, the new definition for knowledge ecosystems indicates the increasing blurriness of spatial boundaries and nowadays, knowledge ecosystems are operating in a more global scale (Järvi et al, 2018). Unlike in business and innovation ecosystems, focal actors in knowledge ecosystems (universities and research centres) are not involved in direct competitions (Clarysse et al, 2014).…”
Section: Mechanisms Ofevccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Co-exploration of new knowledge in decentralized networks is the mutual objective of actors, assisted by innovation intermediaries, and by co-innovation within defined geographical clusters (Valkokari, 2015). Having said that, the new definition for knowledge ecosystems indicates the increasing blurriness of spatial boundaries and nowadays, knowledge ecosystems are operating in a more global scale (Järvi et al, 2018). Unlike in business and innovation ecosystems, focal actors in knowledge ecosystems (universities and research centres) are not involved in direct competitions (Clarysse et al, 2014).…”
Section: Mechanisms Ofevccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on whether a knowledge ecosystem specializes in a knowledge domain or is still in pursuit of one, EVCC mechanisms can differ. In the former case known as 'partial forms', more formal mechanisms for membership and access to knowledge and resources are common, whereas in the latter case known as 'prefigurative forms', less formal and more voluntary mechanisms are used (Järvi et al, 2018). In the same vein, value capture mechanisms in knowledge ecosystems differ according to the technology lifecycle.…”
Section: Mechanisms Ofevccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where innovation ecosystems are focused on interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral collaboration which results in new competencies and resources (Schroth & Häußermann, 2018), the entrepreneurial ecosystems are more directed towards coordinating and fostering social networks within particular geographical contexts (Stam & Spiegel, 2016). And, knowledge ecosystems are organized around a joint knowledge search on a particular context of study (Järvi & Almpanopoulou, 2018).…”
Section: Key Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that efforts to develop theory both from complex adaptive systems (e.g., Peltoniemi, 2006) and institutional theory (e.g., Vargo et al, 2015) show particular promise for creating bases for theorizing on innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Finally, some studies have recently examined ecosystems through organizational lenses, viewing them as meta-organizations (e.g., Järvi et al, 2018). These and other types of theoretical approaches related to the organization of innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems could be useful to understand the "microfoundations" of ecosystem governance.…”
Section: What Is the Biggest Challenge In Conducting Ecosystem Research?mentioning
confidence: 99%