2018
DOI: 10.18438/eblip28601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Factors as Predictors of Knowledge Management Practices in Federal University Libraries in Nigeria

Abstract: Objective -University libraries in Nigeria are facing challenges arising from poor funding, increasing user demands, and a competitive information environment. Knowledge management has been accepted by information professionals as a viable management tool, but issues surrounding its application require empirical investigation. The aim of this study is to determine the organizational factors that are correlates and predictors of knowledge management practices in federal university libraries in Nigeria.Methods -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have tried to discuss the benefits of KM to library personnel (Teng and Hawamdeh, 2002) such as promoting a culture of knowledge sharing and expanding the library’s role in the areas of administration and support services (Townley, 2001; Teng and Hawamdeh, 2002). Specific but few studies on KM in libraries have focused on organizational factors influencing KM (Ugwu and Onyancha, 2017), librarians’ awareness or perception of KM (Siddike and Islam, 2011), the relationship between KM and libraries (Roknuzzaman and Umemoto, 2009; Sarrafzadeh et al , 2010), need for KM in libraries (Wen, 2005), KM and digital libraries (Islam and Ikeda, 2014), mapping of KM tools and cycle for libraries (Agarwal and Islam, 2014) and adoption of KM in libraries using Web 2.0 (Islam et al , 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have tried to discuss the benefits of KM to library personnel (Teng and Hawamdeh, 2002) such as promoting a culture of knowledge sharing and expanding the library’s role in the areas of administration and support services (Townley, 2001; Teng and Hawamdeh, 2002). Specific but few studies on KM in libraries have focused on organizational factors influencing KM (Ugwu and Onyancha, 2017), librarians’ awareness or perception of KM (Siddike and Islam, 2011), the relationship between KM and libraries (Roknuzzaman and Umemoto, 2009; Sarrafzadeh et al , 2010), need for KM in libraries (Wen, 2005), KM and digital libraries (Islam and Ikeda, 2014), mapping of KM tools and cycle for libraries (Agarwal and Islam, 2014) and adoption of KM in libraries using Web 2.0 (Islam et al , 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca eğitim durumu, meslek, meslekte çalışma yılı ve kurumda çalışma yılı değişkenlerine göre bireysel iş performansının anlamlı düzeyde farklılık göstermediği tespit edilmiştir. Literatür incelendiğinde iş performansı ile cinsiyet arasında anlamlı ilişki olduğunu ortaya koyan birçok çalışma 19,25,[31][32][33] olmakla birlikte bunun aksini ortaya koyan çalışmaların 34,35 olduğu da görülmüştür. Sonuçlarda bu tip farklılıkların görülmesinde performans ölçümünde bazı çalışmalarda görev performansını, bazılarında iş performansını, diğerlerinde ise bireysel iş performansının kullanılmasından kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir.…”
Section: Bireyselunclassified
“…Cinsiyetin yanı sıra iş performansının eğitim düzeyi ve görev süresi değişkenlerine göre farklılık göstermediğini destekleyen araştırmaların olduğu da görülmüştür [31][32][33] . Ancak Kalia ve Bhardwaj (2019) 34 ile Ugwu ve Ugwu (2017) 35 'in yaptıkları çalışmada eğitim düzeyi ile görev süresine göre iş performansının anlamlı düzeyde fark gösterdiği ortaya konulmuştur. Bu iki çalışmanın otel ve kütüphane çalışanları üzerinde yapılmış olması bu farkın sebebini ortaya koymaktadır.…”
Section: Bireyselunclassified