2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00152-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
821
2
28

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 935 publications
(888 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
37
821
2
28
Order By: Relevance
“…The term, adoption is about the decision of any individual or organization to make use of innovation [48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. In the organizational context, adoption is associated to admit a innovation for implementation [55].…”
Section: Adoption Of Hismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term, adoption is about the decision of any individual or organization to make use of innovation [48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. In the organizational context, adoption is associated to admit a innovation for implementation [55].…”
Section: Adoption Of Hismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these four dimensions enable organisations to systematically identify, capture, interpret, share, re-frame, and re-codify new knowledge, to link it with their own existing knowledge base, and to put it to appropriate use, resulting in an improved ability to assimilate innovations [18], [29], [33]. Thus, an organisation"s absorptive capacity is positively associated with adoption [18], [33], [34]. Accordingly, the following hypothesis is proposed:…”
Section: Absorptive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UTAUT was initially introduced by Venkatesh et al (2003) to consolidate prior TAMrelated studies (Marchewka et al, 2007) and they integrated constructs of eight prominent models which are Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989), Motivational Model (MM) , Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991), Combined TAM-TPB (C-TAM-TPB) (Taylor and Todd, 1995), Model of PC Utilization (MPCU) (Varela et al, 1991), Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) (Rogers, 2003) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) (Compeau and Higgins, 1995).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informal individual networks have a crucial impact on the transfer of knowledge process within organizations (Reagans and McEvily, 2003). Moreover, those informal social networks connect most members within the same organization or organizations in different industries (Frambach and Schillewaert, 2002). In virtual networking, individuals are able to learn about various innovations and practices that are useful to them (Messinger et al, 2009).…”
Section: Virtual Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation