2023
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational justice research: A review, synthesis, and research agenda

Abstract: We conducted a general, semi‐systematic literature review on organizational justice. Based on this review, we first explored the various ways in which organizational justice was conceptualized. Second, we explained the importance of organizational justice by reviewing and synthesizing theoretical frameworks in organizational justice research and studies that analyzed the effects of justice on employee outcomes. Subsequently, we shifted the focus from the individual to the team level by reviewing and synthesizi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
(390 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our research deepens the comprehension of why supervisor fairness influences job satisfaction by examining six distinct explanatory mechanisms derived from different theoretical perspectives on fairness research. Previous organizational justice research has developed several theoretical frameworks, arguing that employees respond to fairness due to reasons like outcome favorability, maintaining a positive identity, trustworthiness, feelings of uncertainty, morality and felt obligations (Adamovic, 2023; Colquitt et al ., 2005a; Cropanzano and Ambrose, 2015; Moliner et al ., 2017). We show that each theoretical perspective provides a nuanced explanation and mechanism about why supervisor fairness influences job satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, our research deepens the comprehension of why supervisor fairness influences job satisfaction by examining six distinct explanatory mechanisms derived from different theoretical perspectives on fairness research. Previous organizational justice research has developed several theoretical frameworks, arguing that employees respond to fairness due to reasons like outcome favorability, maintaining a positive identity, trustworthiness, feelings of uncertainty, morality and felt obligations (Adamovic, 2023; Colquitt et al ., 2005a; Cropanzano and Ambrose, 2015; Moliner et al ., 2017). We show that each theoretical perspective provides a nuanced explanation and mechanism about why supervisor fairness influences job satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing recognition of fairness, justice and morality in the workplace and business, organizational justice research has become one of the most important areas in organizational behavior research (Adamovic, 2023; Moliner et al ., 2017). To expand organizational justice research, we compare six distinct explanatory mechanisms from organizational justice research to illuminate why and how supervisor fairness influences job satisfaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lind and van den Bos (2002, p. 216) state "What appears to be happening is that people use fairness to manage their reactions to uncertainty, finding comfort in related or even unrelated fair experiences and finding additional distress in unfair experiences". Thus, in the context of uncertainty (e.g., indigenization), individuals gather all available justice-related information (Adamovic 2023). Accordingly, when expatriates are uncertain or attend uncertain events related to indigenization, they become more concerned about fairness and justice issues (Lind and van den Bos 2002).…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Perceived Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in this manner can we improve the rationality and viability of decision making while accurately reflecting the requirements and interests of all stakeholders [3]. Secondly, fairness helps to improve the acceptability of decision making [4]. A fair decision-making process increases the likelihood that the parties involved will accept it in the end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%