2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organocatalytic Asymmetric Three-Component Povarov Reactions of Anilines and Aldehydes

Abstract: We report the first highly enantio-and diastereoselective three-component Povarov reaction between anilines and aldehydes catalyzed by a chiral amine catalyst. A wide variety of substituted tetrahydroquinolines were obtained with moderate to good yields and excellent enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity (up to 99% ee and >95:5 dr) under the reaction conditions. Furthermore, the reaction intermediates could be efficiently converted to other valuable building blocks. Letter pubs.acs.org/OrgLett

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of exergonic energy, rss path is more preferential than sss one owing to the more stable of rss‐int8 (−47.20 kcal mol −1 ) than sss‐int8 . This outcome agrees with experiment since the absolute configuration of THQ alcohol was detected to be 1R2S3S by the single X‐ray analysis of main product [13]. Whereas, an inconsistent partiality is drawn from the comparison of energy barriers of ring‐opening/cyclization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the perspective of exergonic energy, rss path is more preferential than sss one owing to the more stable of rss‐int8 (−47.20 kcal mol −1 ) than sss‐int8 . This outcome agrees with experiment since the absolute configuration of THQ alcohol was detected to be 1R2S3S by the single X‐ray analysis of main product [13]. Whereas, an inconsistent partiality is drawn from the comparison of energy barriers of ring‐opening/cyclization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The relative energies of all stationary points in four paths are listed in Table S1 and the optimized structure of TSs are shown in Figure S1. According to the energy barrier of ts1 relative to int4 (Table 1), ss path is not superior to other three from kinetics, which is in contradiction to the dominant 2S3S configuration of product THQ ketone in experiment [13]. From the stability of int5 point of view, the order of superiority for four paths should be ss > rr > rs > sr in light of exergonic energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations