2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c03603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organophosphate Esters in Foodstuffs from Multiple Provinces in China: Possible Sources during Food Processing and Implications for Human Exposure

Abstract: With increasing application of organophosphate esters (OPEs) as flame retardants and plasticizers in the world, the health and ecological risks posed by these chemicals have raised people's concern over the years. Despite the fact that dietary intake is an important pathway for human exposure to OPEs, monitoring on OPEs in foodstuffs is scarce. In this study, we measured 14 OPEs in both packaged (n = 229) and fresh (n = 58) foodstuffs collected across China with a new method that was developed by two-stage sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have identified the presence of both tri-OPEs and several di-OPEs in foodstuffs. ,, It has been suspected by numerous researchers that food packaging could be an important source of tri-OPE contamination in food. This is corroborated by our previous study, which found 28 tri-OPEs in food contact materials and further demonstrated the migration of some tri-OPEs into food simulants . Given the information from the PubChem database, which suggests that certain di-OPEs can be used directly as additives in polymeric materials or can result from the degradation of tri-OPEs, there exists the potential for di-OPE contamination during food packaging processes .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Recent studies have identified the presence of both tri-OPEs and several di-OPEs in foodstuffs. ,, It has been suspected by numerous researchers that food packaging could be an important source of tri-OPE contamination in food. This is corroborated by our previous study, which found 28 tri-OPEs in food contact materials and further demonstrated the migration of some tri-OPEs into food simulants . Given the information from the PubChem database, which suggests that certain di-OPEs can be used directly as additives in polymeric materials or can result from the degradation of tri-OPEs, there exists the potential for di-OPE contamination during food packaging processes .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…OPFRs can be detected in agricultural products such as grains (rice, corn), vegetables (potatoes, cereals, tomatoes, cabbage, rape, carrots, broccoli, onions, and celery), fruits (apples, bananas, oranges, pears, peaches, citrus, strawberries, and grapes), meat, dairy products, and eggs around the world. , Pregnant women and mothers have a higher daily consumption of OPFRs than other adults, perhaps due to their specialized prenatal and postnatal diets. , Throughout the pregnancy and breastfeeding period, women should have a well-balanced diet and refuel frequently in order to obtain sufficient calories and nutrients. , They may consume more food rich in protein, vitamins, and healthy fats, which maybe contribute to a relative increase in their body burdens of OPFRs . OPFRs can be frequently detected in cereals and meat. For example, China has the highest levels of ∑OPFRs in rice worldwide, as high as 802 ng/g dry weight (dw) . The median concentration of OPFRs in meats and fish collected from a local market in America was higher than those in dairy and cereal products .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of the total OPEs ranged from 14.9 to 588 ng/g ww (average, 96.9 ± 97.9; median, 73.9; geometric mean (GM), 75.1) in HF, and the eight most abundant analogues were TCEP (average, 32.3 ng/g ww), TEP (27.5), CDPP (20.5), TPhP (5.90), TCIPP (4.80), TDCIPP (1.61), EHDPP (0.63), and TnBP (0.62), respectively. The OPE concentrations in HF were at least 1 order of magnitude higher than those reported in packaged food from China (GM, 5.06 ng/g ww) 19 and the United States (<10 ng/g ww) 24 and 5 times higher than stock food from Belgium. 18 In comparison to fresh food, HF showed remarkably higher OPE levels than meat (GM,1.07 ng/g ww), aquatic products (1.18), and eggs (0.62) from China, 19 as well as meat (median, 6.76 ng/g ww), fish/seafood (7.11), dairy products (1.22), and cereal (1.94) from the United States 24 and meat and fish from Sweden (1.01−2.46 ng/g ww) 22 and Canada (0.26−3.20 ng/g ww).…”
Section: Self-heating Lunch Boxes Caused Ope Contamination In Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Wang et al examined 16 food additives as potential OPE sources but found that their concentrations accounted for only 9.0% of the processed food, implying their limited contributions. 19 Therefore, there might be other OPE sources in the processed food. As known, processed food is usually fried to minimize water content for preservation purposes, and oils and fats are typically one of the most OPE-contaminated food categories.…”
Section: Source Apportionmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation