2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation-dependent hardness and nanoindentation-induced deformation mechanisms of WC crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the nanohardness H of AZ31 and pure Mg as a function of the declination angle Φ (i.e., the angle between the c-axis of the hcp crystal lattice and the normal to the sample surface, which is parallel to the indentation direction). The dependence of the nanohardness on the angle corresponding to the rotation of the crystal lattice about the c-axis was not investigated; this is consistent with the study by Csanadi et al [21], who demonstrated its negligible magnitude, however, in the case of tungsten carbide.…”
Section: Nanohardnesssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 2 shows the nanohardness H of AZ31 and pure Mg as a function of the declination angle Φ (i.e., the angle between the c-axis of the hcp crystal lattice and the normal to the sample surface, which is parallel to the indentation direction). The dependence of the nanohardness on the angle corresponding to the rotation of the crystal lattice about the c-axis was not investigated; this is consistent with the study by Csanadi et al [21], who demonstrated its negligible magnitude, however, in the case of tungsten carbide.…”
Section: Nanohardnesssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The nanohardness dependence for pure Mg agrees well with [5], where the experimental values that were measured by displacement-controlled nanoindentation remain constant or marginally increase at Φ < 30°, decrease by approximately 30 % within 30° < Φ < 55°, and are rather constant again for Φ > 55°. It is worth noting that the decrease in nanohardness with increasing Φ was also reported for tungsten carbide [21] and titanium [22][23][24], despite the different values of the c/a axial ratio, which partly determines the preferred deformation mechanisms. Due to the lack of grains with a suitable size and Φ < 27° for pure Mg and Φ < 10° for AZ31, it was not technically feasible to measure the nanohardness evolution for smaller Φ.…”
Section: Nanohardnessmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hardness of the textured nanocrystalline WC coating (Fig. 5a) was around 37 GPa which is just below the hardness of basal planes of WC microcrystals (43-40 GPa) [33]. Lower values in the coatings may be attributed to the deviations of the textured nanocrystals from the ideal orientation and to the presence of boundaries among them.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Vs Acetylene and Hydrogen Additionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The nanoindentation method has a very small measurement area. Therefore, it is expected to be able to measure the effect of the crystal orientation or microdefects of specimens on the mechanical properties of a material [3][4][5][6][7]. In this report, in order to investigate the effect of the crystal orientation, the hardness and the reduced modulus of the single crystal of sapphire were measured by changing the direction angle of Berkovich indenter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%