2006
DOI: 10.1021/la0532454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation of a Monoclonal Antibody Adsorbed at the Solid/Solution Interface:  A Combined Study Using Atomic Force Microscopy and Neutron Reflectivity

Abstract: Conformational orientations of a mouse monoclonal antibody to the beta unit of human chorionic gonadotrophin (anti-beta-hCG) at the hydrophilic silicon oxide/water interface were investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and neutron reflectivity (NR). The surface structural characterization was conducted with the antibody concentration in solution ranging from 2 to 50 mg.L(-1) with the ionic strength kept at 20 mM and pH = 7.0. It was found that the antibody adopted a predominantly "flat-on" orientation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
116
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
19
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume fraction of the middle layer was reduced slightly to 52.5 per cent, but its thickness was increased to 30 Å , showing that this layer was dominant and contained the majority of the antibody. The total surfaceadsorbed amount reached a maximum of 2.9 mg m -2 , which is consistent with the proximity to the pI of the antibody of around 5.5 [4]. A further increase in pH to 6.1 reduced both thickness and volume fraction of the middle layer, which is consistent with the decline of surface adsorption beyond the pI.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The volume fraction of the middle layer was reduced slightly to 52.5 per cent, but its thickness was increased to 30 Å , showing that this layer was dominant and contained the majority of the antibody. The total surfaceadsorbed amount reached a maximum of 2.9 mg m -2 , which is consistent with the proximity to the pI of the antibody of around 5.5 [4]. A further increase in pH to 6.1 reduced both thickness and volume fraction of the middle layer, which is consistent with the decline of surface adsorption beyond the pI.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The solution was then replaced by a pH 4 buffer, followed by a pH 4 antibody solution. Desorption was observed, and the amount of the adsorbed antibody reduced to the previous level at pH 4, showing that the adsorption was entirely reproducible under the experimental conditions. These results are highly consistent with our previous investigations of anti-human chorionic gonadotropin (anti-hCG) systems, in which the solution pH was changed from 4 to 8, then brought back to 4 again [5].…”
Section: Solution Ph Affects Both Antibody Adsorption and Antigen Binmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…10,11,19,23,25,28 Additional factors that could explain the smaller amount of collagen immobilized in the PL-GP surface are the lower silanization coverage eventually limiting the amount of collagen that can be adsorbed from higher concentration solutions and that the epoxy organofunctional group of GPTES is susceptible to hydrolyzation when exposed to acidic aqueous solutions in the long term. 56 Since the reaction between silanes and collagen is performed at a pH ≈ 6, it is possible that some GPTES molecules undergo hydrolysis, consequently hampering further collagen bonding.…”
Section: Owlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interfacial assembly of proteins X. Zhao et al S663 (Xu et al 2006b). Figure 3a shows the best fits to the measured reflectivity in the presence of 2 mg l 21 of anti-b-hCG in D 2 O by assuming that the antibodies adopted 'flat-on' (solid line), 'side-on' (dashed line) and 'end-on' or 'head on' (dotted line) orientations (figure 3b).…”
Section: Antibodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, neither the best fits of 'side-on' nor 'end-on' orientations would fit the shape of the measured reflectivity profile. The adsorption of anti-b-hCG at higher solution concentrations was also studied and the best fits to the measured reflectivity profiles are shown in figure 4a (Xu et al 2006b). The D 2 O profile and the data at 2 mg l 21 are plotted together for comparison.…”
Section: Antibodymentioning
confidence: 99%