1972
DOI: 10.1070/pu1972v014n06abeh004824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation of Electron Spins in Semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
180
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
180
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3−5 In order to clarify the limitations and mechanisms for spin relaxation in monolayer graphene devices a lot of effort has been done by both experimentalists 3−9 and theoreticians 2,10−12 but up to now this topic is still under debate. Theoretical results pointed out that the D'Yakonov−Perel mechanism 13 and locally enhanced spin−orbit coupling due to impurities and lattice deformations 2,10 are the most probable mechanisms for spin relaxation for measurements in graphene spintronic devices. 2,11,12 Since all devices studied so far were fabricated on substrates (SiO 2 3−8 or SiC 14 ) in which the intrinsic properties of graphene are masked due to the electronic coupling to the substrate, 15 no previous study was able to confirm these recent theoretical predictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3−5 In order to clarify the limitations and mechanisms for spin relaxation in monolayer graphene devices a lot of effort has been done by both experimentalists 3−9 and theoreticians 2,10−12 but up to now this topic is still under debate. Theoretical results pointed out that the D'Yakonov−Perel mechanism 13 and locally enhanced spin−orbit coupling due to impurities and lattice deformations 2,10 are the most probable mechanisms for spin relaxation for measurements in graphene spintronic devices. 2,11,12 Since all devices studied so far were fabricated on substrates (SiO 2 3−8 or SiC 14 ) in which the intrinsic properties of graphene are masked due to the electronic coupling to the substrate, 15 no previous study was able to confirm these recent theoretical predictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spin relaxation mechanism is best understood from the dependence of τ so with elastic scattering time τ (or µ ) where * / τ μ = m e :a linear relation indicates the Elliott-Yafet mechanism [ 32 ] and an inverse relation indicates D'yakonov and Perel' (Rashba) mechanism. [ 33 ] Figure 3 a shows the variation in τ so as a function of 1/ µ along the [001] and [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] for the 5 uc LAO sample. In both directions, there is an inverse relationship between τ so and µ , which implies a Rashba SOC at the interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, discrete and random modulations of the transition frequency arise when one studies 1/f -noise caused by random two-level fluctuators in superconducting qubits [162,163]. Closely related phenomena include the Dyakonov-Perel effect [164], the Dicke line narrowing of Doppler spectra [165], and the quantum Zeno effect [166]. The incoherent modulation of the transition energy between two discrete values can be modelled as a random-telegraph noise (RTN) created by a symmetric two-valued Poisson fluctuation process.…”
Section: Random Telegraph Noise and Motional Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%