The Behavior of the Laboratory Rat 2004
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162851.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orienting and Placing

Abstract: This chapter describes behavioral tests that have been useful for examining the potential clinical efficacy of interventions that might be beneficial for neurological disorders. It is important to distinguish whether an intervention promotes brain repair mechanisms, saves cells, enhances motor learning and retraining, or reduces the extent of secondary degeneration of tissue. The chapter includes a subset of sensorimotor tests that are considered to be reliable, sensitive, quantitative, and easy to use in rat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test has been previously shown to be a sensitive assessment of somatosensory and attentional deficits following injury to the frontal lobes and has been described in detail (Schallert et al, 2000, Hoane et al, 2003, Schallert and Woodlee, 2005, Hoane et al, 2006c, Hoane et al, 2007. A slightly modified version of this task was used in this experiment.…”
Section: Bilateral Tactile Adhesive Removal Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test has been previously shown to be a sensitive assessment of somatosensory and attentional deficits following injury to the frontal lobes and has been described in detail (Schallert et al, 2000, Hoane et al, 2003, Schallert and Woodlee, 2005, Hoane et al, 2006c, Hoane et al, 2007. A slightly modified version of this task was used in this experiment.…”
Section: Bilateral Tactile Adhesive Removal Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of wall contacts made using the ipsilateral (unimpaired), the contralateral (impaired), and both (simultaneously) limbs is recorded, and an asymmetry score calculated as the number of "ipsi" observations plus 1/2 the number of "both" observations, divided by the total number of observations (ipsi plus contra plus both). In this overall asymmetry percentage score, 50% indicates an animal that explores symmetrically with both limbs, higher scores (>50%) indicate a greater reliance on the ipsilateral limb, and lower scores (<50%) indicate a greater reliance on the contralateral limb (see Schallert and Woodlee, 2005 for more details and tips on performing the test). On each day of testing we recorded 20 limb uses; the time required to generate this number of observations varied from animal to animal.…”
Section: Limb-use Asymmetry ("Cylinder") Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test measures sensorimotor integration and has also been described in great detail [5,12,13,25]. Animals were tested on post-transplant days 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 21, 28, and 35.…”
Section: Vibrissae-forelimb Placing Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task measures somatosensory dysfunction following injury and is a sensitive measure of limb use asymmetry following unilateral brain injury and stroke [16,17,25]. Animals were tested on post-transplantation days 5 and 12.…”
Section: Limb Use Asymmetry Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation