2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and abundance of marine litter along sandy beaches of the Turkish Western Black Sea Coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
80
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
11
80
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, compared with some recent studies on beach litter, the average densities on the Galician coast seem to be lower than in tourist areas of the Mediterranean (3600 BLI per 100 m; Martinez-Ribes et al 2007), the Black sea (2400 BLI per 100 m; Topçu et al 2013) and populated areas of Brazil (500 to 10000 BLI per 100 m; Tourinho and Fililman 2011). Comparisons with other studies in the Atlantic show that our average values are very similar to those reported for England (85 BLI per 100 m; Willoughby et al 1997) and the US Atlantic coast (72 BLI per 100 m; Ribic 1998) and very close to those of the North Atlantic (66 BLI per 100; Barnes and Milner 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Nevertheless, compared with some recent studies on beach litter, the average densities on the Galician coast seem to be lower than in tourist areas of the Mediterranean (3600 BLI per 100 m; Martinez-Ribes et al 2007), the Black sea (2400 BLI per 100 m; Topçu et al 2013) and populated areas of Brazil (500 to 10000 BLI per 100 m; Tourinho and Fililman 2011). Comparisons with other studies in the Atlantic show that our average values are very similar to those reported for England (85 BLI per 100 m; Willoughby et al 1997) and the US Atlantic coast (72 BLI per 100 m; Ribic 1998) and very close to those of the North Atlantic (66 BLI per 100; Barnes and Milner 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Data expressed as items m −2 or larger areas are more convenient for comparisons. Most studies have reported densities in the m −2 range ( Topçu et al 2013). Data expressed as quantities per linear distance are more difficult to compare because the results depend on beach size/width.…”
Section: Beachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data expressed as quantities per linear distance are more difficult to compare because the results depend on beach size/width. Plastic accounts for a large part of litter on beaches from many areas with up to 68 % in California (Rosevelt et al 2013), 77 % in the south east of Taiwan (Liu et al 2013), Eriksson et al (2013) 86 % in Chile (Thiel et al 2013), and 91 % in the southern Black Sea (Topçu et al 2013). However, other types of litter or specific types of plastic may also be important in some areas, in terms of type (Styrofoam, crafted wood) or use (fishing gear).…”
Section: Beachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survey was not carried out if the conditions were unfavorable or beach sand was covered by ice/ snow. The classification of the BML was done according to the list provided in OSPAR guidelines (OSPAR, 2010) and expert judgement based on the UNEP guidelines (Cheshire et al 2009) and Eda et al (2012) research. This was done in order to associate the litter to the different possible functional use and/or source.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%