The increasing interest in high-performance and economical photovoltaic materials has heightened the emergency to develop the organic-inorganic hybrid halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Since the debut of PSCs proposed by Miyasaka et al. in 2009, the PSCs community has achieved great success such as the rocketing power conversion efficiency (PCE) from the initial 3.8% to the latest 25.5% in 2020 in single-junction architectures, and to 29.1% in silicon-based tandem cells. [1-5] This eye-catching breakthrough is contributed by the numerous merits of perovskite material such as long carrier-diffusion length, proper bandgap (1.5-1.6 eV), and facile solution processing. [6-10] In general, the PSCs are classified by architecture into normal (n-i-p) and inverted (p-in) structures, where the perovskite layer is sandwiched between the electron transport layer (ETL) and hole transport layer (HTL). [11,12] For the normal-structured PSCs, metal oxides such as SnO 2 and TiO 2 are commonly used as the bottom ETL, whereas the organic materials such as Spiro-OMeTAD are used as HTL. [13,14] The PSCs feature high efficiency up to 24.82% by introducing fluorinated isomeric analogs in Spiro-OMeTAD. [15] However, the normal-structured PSCs with high PCE are usually based on mesoscopic n-type TiO 2 or insulating Al 2 O 3 to accelerate electron mobility, while the high sintering temperature (>450 C) limits the application in low-cost flexible devices. [16,17] Meanwhile, the upper HTL used organic materials is extremely costly and unstable in air. In contrast, the bottom HTL of inverted (p-in) PSCs is low-temperature processable (<100 C) and cheaper. Therefore, the inverted planar PSCs have a wider application prospect on account of lowtemperature preparation, excellent reproducibility, and negligible hysteresis. [18,19] In addition, the efficiency of the small-area inverted planar PSCs has reached a certified value of 22.3%. [20] Also the record efficiency of over 18% for a mini-module has been achieved in an aperture area of 19.276 cm 2. [21] These results indicate that the inverted structure may be more suitable for manufacturing large-area cells with long-term stability and outstanding efficiency, which means inverted planar PSCs have a better prospect in commercialization. The most common structure of the inverted PSCs is indium tin oxide (ITO)/Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS)/perovskite/PCBM/metal electrode. [22,23] PEDOT:PSS is the most extensively used hole transfer material in inverted PSCs due to its optical transparency, high thermal stability, and good mechanical flexibility.