Orofacial Esthetic Scale and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire: development and psychometric properties of the Finnish version

Campos, Lucas Arrais; Kämäräinen, Minna; Silvola, Anna‐Sofia; Marôco, João; Peltomäki, Timo; Campos, Juliana Álvares Duarte Bonini

doi:10.1080/00016357.2020.1857435

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the results obtained in this study for both reliability and stability were similar to versions in other languages and with samples of different sizes [24,25,26,27,28,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Although the sample size was small, it is understood that in the context of qualitative research, this may be small since the results are interpreted based on the context rather than quantitatively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the PIDAQ questionnaire in Chilean adolescents with oral malocclusion

Gonzalez,

Ortuño,

Macherone

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) is a useful index to assess aspects of oral malocclusion that impact individuals' oral health-related quality of life. This study aimed to validate the cross-cultural adaptation and equivalence of the PIDAQ questionnaire to the language of the Chilean adolescent population. Methods: We used the framework of the Guidelines for the Transcultural Adaptation Process of self-reports and the Manuals for a language inclusive for the transcultural adaptation of the PIDAQ. The instrument was tested on 32 Chilean adolescents with oral malocclusion between 11 and 17 years of age. We evaluated equivalence considering criterion, content, and construct validity according to COSMIN methodology and validated by Cronbach's alpha statistical test. A total of 23 items in the questionnaire were tested according to how clear and understandable the questions were to the reader and according to a Likert scale graduated in: not at all clear, unclear, unclear, clear, or very clear. For temporal stability, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: We obtained an acceptable reliability with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.951 for the total questionnaire. The questions grouped according to the dimensions of dental self-confidence, social impact, psychological impact, and esthetic concern obtained a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.955, 0.947, 0.946 and 0.939, respectively. The questionnaire showed high temporal stability at the test-retest with a total ICC of 0.907 (0.885-0.913). Conclusion: The cross-cultural adaptation of the PIDAQ questionnaire achieved equivalence with the original instrument and obtained reliable criterion, content, and construct validity in Chilean adolescents.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the PIDAQ questionnaire in Chilean adolescents with oral malocclusion

Gonzalez,

Ortuño,

Macherone

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although OHIP-14 is one of the most widely used OHRQoL measures, it is an instrument with functional bias, and it might be considered not a very sensitive instrument for measuring OHRQoL related to orthodontic problems ( 48 ). There are other measures available more specific for this purpose, but the Finnish translations were not available at the time of the data collection ( 49 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Malocclusion severity and its associations with oral health-related quality of life in an adult population

Närhi

Tolvanen²,

Pirttiniemi

et al. 2021

European Journal of Orthodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Aim The aim of this study was to investigate malocclusion severity and its associations with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among middle-aged adults. Materials and methods The study material consisted of 1786 subjects from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 who attended dental and oral examination as part of the 46-year-old follow-up study. Malocclusion severity was assessed using the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) and the Peer Assessment Rating index (PAR) from digital 3D dental models. Participants also answered a questionnaire including the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and a question on their satisfaction with occlusal function. Differences between malocclusion severity groups were evaluated for both genders separately. For adjusted models, multivariate Poisson regression models were conducted. Results In this study population, 31.3% had great or very great orthodontic treatment need according to DHC and the mean PAR total score was 22.05. The most severe malocclusions were associated with OHRQoL, especially the psychosocial and handicap dimensions, and satisfaction with occlusal function. There was a significant difference between genders, men having more severe malocclusion but women reporting more OHRQoL impacts. Conclusion One third of the study population were considered to have severe malocclusion. There was an association between malocclusion severity and OHRQoL in adult population, particularly in women.

show abstract

“…Version of PIDAQ presented by Campos et al [ 15 , 20 ] was used in the present study. This version has 24 items with 5-point Likert-type response scale (0: I do not agree to 4: I totally agree) that assess 4 dimensions of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics (Dental Self-Confidence, Social Impact, Psychological Impact, and Aesthetic Concern).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The self-perception of orofacial appearance was assessed using the Finnish and Portuguese versions of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) [15][16][17] and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetic Questionnaire (PIDAQ) [15,18,19]. The OES is a 7-item, one-dimension scale with an PLOS ONE 11-point numerical response scale ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).…”

Section: Measuring Scalesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, including the self-perception of orofacial appearance in research on demand for aesthetic dental treatment is important. Because the dimensions of OHRQoL cannot be directly measured, the use of specific means, psychometric scales, are necessary [14,15]. The Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) [15][16][17] and the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetic Questionnaire (PIDAQ) [15,18,19] are two scales that evaluate self-perception of orofacial appearance and have shown good indicators of validity and reliability in different populations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Aesthetic dental treatment, orofacial appearance, and life satisfaction of Finnish and Brazilian adults

Campos

Marôco

et al. 2023

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To study the probability of seeking/undergoing aesthetic dental treatment (ADT) and compare self-perception of orofacial appearance (OA) based on sex, age, and monthly income; and to estimate the impact of OA on life satisfaction (LS) among Finnish and Brazilian adults, considering the indirect effect of receiving ADT and the moderating effects of those sociodemographic variables. Methods This was an online cross-sectional study. Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES), Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were used. Probability of seeking/receiving ADT was calculated using logistic regression and odds ratio (OR). OA scores were compared according to sociodemographic characteristics (ANOVA, α = 5%). Structural equations models estimated the impact of OA on LS. Results 3,614 Finns [75.1% female, 32.0 (SD = 11.6) years] and 3,979 Brazilians [69.9% female, 33.0 (SD = 11.3) years] participated in the study. Women were more likely to receive ADT than men in both countries (OR>1.3). However, no statistically or practical significant differences were observed in OA between sexes (p>0.05 or p<0.05, ηp2 = 0.00–0.02). In Finland, demand for ADT (OR = 0.9–1.0) and OA scores (p>0.05) were the same among different ages and monthly income. In Brazil, younger individuals (OR>1.6) and those with higher monthly income (OR>2.7) were more likely to receive ADT, while those with lower income had a greater psychosocial impact of OA (p<0.05; ηp2>0.07). Individuals who were more satisfied with their own OA and had less psychosocial impact from OA had higher levels of LS (β = 0.31–0.34; p<0.01; explained variance: 9.8–13.1%). Conclusion Demand for ADT is influenced by sociodemographic and cultural factors. Greater societal pressure on physical appearance is observed among women in Western countries. In countries with high socioeconomic inequalities, consumerism and social prestige are involved in this demand. Self-perception of orofacial appearance plays a significant role in individuals’ subjective well-being. Therefore, the planning of aesthetic treatments in the orofacial region should consider the patient’s perceptions and social context.

show abstract

Orofacial Esthetic Scale and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire: development and psychometric properties of the Finnish version

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the PIDAQ questionnaire in Chilean adolescents with oral malocclusion

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the PIDAQ questionnaire in Chilean adolescents with oral malocclusion

Malocclusion severity and its associations with oral health-related quality of life in an adult population

Aesthetic dental treatment, orofacial appearance, and life satisfaction of Finnish and Brazilian adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About