2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orosensory deprivation alters taste-elicited c-Fos expression in the parabrachial nucleus of neonatal rats

Abstract: In the present study we examined the effects of neonatal orosensory deprivation on taste-elicited gustatory activity in the rat parabrachial nucleus (PBN) using the functional anatomical marker cFos. Animals in three groups (GG, GO and GM) received gastric cannula implantation surgery on postnatal day 9 (P9). Animals in the fourth group (MR) did not receive any surgery. GG rats were fed by infusion of artificial milk directly into the stomach. GO rats were fed by intraoral infusion of artificial milk. GM and M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, there are 2 primary differences when taste stimuli are given in drinking bottles versus intraoral cannulae. First, animals consume fluids from drinking bottles intermittently in brief "bouts" (Stellar and Hill 1952;Gannon et al 1992;Boughter et al 2007;Johnson et al 2010; Barkley-Levenson and Crabbe 2012); whereas, taste stimuli are usually infused at a constant flow rate through intraoral cannulas (Harrer and Travers 1996;Houpt et al 1996;King et al 1999King et al , 2000King et al , 2003King et al , 2014King et al , 2015Travers 2002;Chan et al 2004;Jarrett et al 2007;Biondolillo et al 2009;Wilmouth and Spear 2009;Haino et al 2010;Nagy et al 2012;Zhao et al 2012;Riley and King 2013;Tokita et al 2014). Second, in order to encourage animals to consume fluids, animals are placed on water-restriction (e.g., 1 h of water/24 h for 2-3 days prior to experiment), but animals are rarely water deprived prior to receiving taste stimuli via intraoral cannulae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there are 2 primary differences when taste stimuli are given in drinking bottles versus intraoral cannulae. First, animals consume fluids from drinking bottles intermittently in brief "bouts" (Stellar and Hill 1952;Gannon et al 1992;Boughter et al 2007;Johnson et al 2010; Barkley-Levenson and Crabbe 2012); whereas, taste stimuli are usually infused at a constant flow rate through intraoral cannulas (Harrer and Travers 1996;Houpt et al 1996;King et al 1999King et al , 2000King et al , 2003King et al , 2014King et al , 2015Travers 2002;Chan et al 2004;Jarrett et al 2007;Biondolillo et al 2009;Wilmouth and Spear 2009;Haino et al 2010;Nagy et al 2012;Zhao et al 2012;Riley and King 2013;Tokita et al 2014). Second, in order to encourage animals to consume fluids, animals are placed on water-restriction (e.g., 1 h of water/24 h for 2-3 days prior to experiment), but animals are rarely water deprived prior to receiving taste stimuli via intraoral cannulae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the degree of collateralization should shed light on the functional organization of PbN efferents, i.e. whether the same information is conveyed to multiple targets from distinct subnuclei, which have been suggested to possess distinct functions (Yamamoto et al, 1994; Geerling and Loewy, 2007; Tokita et al, 2007; Hashimoto et al, 2009; Haino et al, 2010). Furthermore, these studies were conducted using mice, a species of bourgeoning use in gustatory research, albeit with limited study of its central taste system physiology (McCaughey, 2007; Lemon and Margolskee, 2009) or anatomy (Sugita and Shiba, 2005; Travers et al, 2007; Zaidi et al, 2006; Hashimoto et al, 2009; Tokita et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there have been a number of taste studies that have used c-Fos activation as a marker to determine where neurons are responding to a stimulus (Yamamoto, T. 1993;Yamamoto, T. et al 1993;Houpt, T. A. et al 1994;Swank, M. W. et al 1994;Yamamoto, T. et al 1994;Houpt, T. A. et al 1996;Streefland, C. et al 1996;Chan, C. Y. et al 2004;Koh, M. T. et al 2005;St Andre, J. et al 2007;Yamamoto, T. et al 2009;Haino, T. et al 2010). In the studies presented here, we used immunohistochemical techniques to label the immediate early gene, c-Fos, as a method of identifying neurons responding to either a visceral stimulus, or a stimulus presented in a lickometer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it critical to ensure that animals are trained and handled properly in order to minimize stress. Also, in our studies, we focus on one area of the brain -the parabrachial nucleus -which is known for visceral (ingestive) and gustatory processing, and the use of Fos staining in these regions is well established (Yamamoto, T. 1993;Yamamoto, T. et al 1993;Swank, M. W. et al 1994;Yamamoto, T. et al 1994;Streefland, C. et al 1996;Navarro, M. et al 2000;St Andre, J. et al 2007;Haino, T. et al 2010). …”
Section: Immediate Early Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%