2015
DOI: 10.1142/s0129055x1550004x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal basis for the Shapovalov form on $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}(n + 1))$

Abstract: Let U be either the classical or quantized universal enveloping algebra of the Lie algebra sl(n + 1) extended over the field of fractions of the Cartan subalgebra. We suggest a PBW basis in U over the extended Cartan subalgebra diagonalizing the contravariant Shapovalov form on generic Verma module. The matrix coefficients of the form are calculated and the inverse form is explicitly constructed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are the incidence relations. Conditions (10), (20) and (24) define completely the flag supervariety F. We then can state the analog of Theorem 3.2 for the superflag.…”
Section: The Plücker Embedding Of the Super Flag Fl(2|0 2|1; 4|1)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They are the incidence relations. Conditions (10), (20) and (24) define completely the flag supervariety F. We then can state the analog of Theorem 3.2 for the superflag.…”
Section: The Plücker Embedding Of the Super Flag Fl(2|0 2|1; 4|1)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This result can easily be generalized to the general first order case. It is related to the q-Shapovalov form [5].…”
Section: First Order Intertwinersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mudrov [22] describes the Shapovalov basis for the Verma modules of U q (su(3)), and we have adapted his proof and construction to an orthonormal basis for the finite-dimensional unitary representations of U q (su (3)). For completeness, we have sketched the proof in Appendix A.…”
Section: The Finite-dimensional Representations Of U Q (Su(3))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However see Oblomkov and Stokman [26] for partial information on the branching rules for the quantum analogue of (gl(2n), gl(n) ⊕ gl(n)). It would be of interest to see whether the results of Mudrov [22] can be used as well in the setting of Oblomkov and Stokman [26] to find precise information on the branching rule for this quantum symmetric pair, or more generally for quantum symmetric pairs involving the quantised universal enveloping algebra of type A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation