2008
DOI: 10.3103/s1055134408040020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal series and limit theorems for canonical U-and V-statistics of stationary connected observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last assertion under the assumption n≥0 ϕ(n) 1/2 < ∞ is, up to inessential details, Theorem 5 in [26]. In [9] the authors express their doubts on correctness in [26] to substituting a dependent process into the function (50). Our conclusion agrees with that of [26].…”
Section: Exemplary Applicationssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last assertion under the assumption n≥0 ϕ(n) 1/2 < ∞ is, up to inessential details, Theorem 5 in [26]. In [9] the authors express their doubts on correctness in [26] to substituting a dependent process into the function (50). Our conclusion agrees with that of [26].…”
Section: Exemplary Applicationssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Using this relation along with (15) and (18) The following sufficient condition for convergence of the series in (14) will be used in Section 9 when considering applications. Expansion of a kernel into an absolutely convergent series whose summands are products of functions in separate variables is natural in the context of the limit theory of U-and V -statistics (see, for example, [9]). Projective tensor products call for using such series to representing arbitrary elements (see Proposition 2.8 in [49]).…”
Section: Growth Rates For Multiparameter Sumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not guaranteed that the joint distribution of X t and X t+h is absolutely continuous with respect to P X 0 ⊗ P X 0 , that is, (1) might fail on a set with nonzero measure. Borisov and Volodko (2008) have shown that this problem does not appear if an additional smoothness assumption on the kernel h is imposed what we therefore also do here. Furthermore, while a proof of the fact that lim sup…”
Section: Remark 1 (I)mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the case of dependent random variables, however, this approach requires some care. As pointed out by Borisov and Volodko (2008), approximation (1) is valid for almost all (x , y ) ∈ supp(P X 0 ⊗ P X 0 ). However, it is not guaranteed that the joint distribution of X t and X t+h is absolutely continuous with respect to P X 0 ⊗ P X 0 , that is, (1) might fail on a set with nonzero measure.…”
Section: Remark 1 (I)mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation