2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthologous Matrix (OMA) algorithm 2.0: more robust to asymmetric evolutionary rates and more scalable hierarchical orthologous group inference

Abstract: MotivationAccurate orthology inference is a fundamental step in many phylogenetics and comparative analysis. Many methods have been proposed, including OMA (Orthologous MAtrix). Yet substantial challenges remain, in particular in coping with fragmented genes or genes evolving at different rates after duplication, and in scaling to large datasets. With more and more genomes available, it is necessary to improve the scalability and robustness of orthology inference methods.ResultsWe present improvements in the O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six taxa each had a single peak, with Ks medians of approximately 0.2 ( Tilia ), approximately 0.3 ( Durio , Firmiana , Heritiera ) or approximately 0.4 ( Bombax, Adansonia ), whereas the two members of Malvoideae ( Gossypium and Hibiscus ), each had two peaks at approximately 0.1/0.5 and approximately 0.3/0.6, respectively. We interpret the younger peak in Gossypium as part of the background gene duplication rate, most likely due to tandemly duplicated genes that retain high sequence similarity to one another, via gene conversion (Panchy et al ; Train et al ). The younger peak in Hibiscus, in contrast, is likely the result of a recent WGM unique to this lineage, as previous work suggests this was an independent event with respect to Gossypium (Kim et al ; Teh et al ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Six taxa each had a single peak, with Ks medians of approximately 0.2 ( Tilia ), approximately 0.3 ( Durio , Firmiana , Heritiera ) or approximately 0.4 ( Bombax, Adansonia ), whereas the two members of Malvoideae ( Gossypium and Hibiscus ), each had two peaks at approximately 0.1/0.5 and approximately 0.3/0.6, respectively. We interpret the younger peak in Gossypium as part of the background gene duplication rate, most likely due to tandemly duplicated genes that retain high sequence similarity to one another, via gene conversion (Panchy et al ; Train et al ). The younger peak in Hibiscus, in contrast, is likely the result of a recent WGM unique to this lineage, as previous work suggests this was an independent event with respect to Gossypium (Kim et al ; Teh et al ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no agreement among approaches, leaving considerable uncertainty as to the history of genome evolution in the Malvaceae. We discuss some of the better‐supported alternative hypotheses and note some methodological issues that complicate WGM inference, including ILS, asymmetrical gene fractionation, varying rates of evolution, and gene conversion (Panchy et al ; Train et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) 17 . The constructed phylogeny overall agrees with the known relationships among the analysed teleost species and indicates that a comparison with the European sea bass as sister group and three-spined stickle back as outgroup is the most appropriate for the analysis of branch-specific evolutionary rates.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resources such as Pfam are suitable for identifying homologs, not orthologs (see Box ). Others, such as Orthologous MAtrix (OMA), focus on identifying pairwise (orthology) relationships between two proteins, while many studies aim for collecting all proteins from an orthologous group (OG) (Box ). Algorithms that infer such groups occasionally split a single group into multiple ones, due to sequence divergence and/or domain dynamics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%