2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillation and non-oscillation of Euler type half-linear differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have (see (54)) r = If this inequality is valid, the considered equation is oscillatory (see Figure 2). Based on known non-oscillation results for = 0 in the continuous case (see, eg, other studies [46][47][48][49][50][51], we conjecture that the equation is non-oscillatory if the opposite inequality holds. It is an open problem.…”
Section: Corollary 51 Let Us Consider the Equationmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have (see (54)) r = If this inequality is valid, the considered equation is oscillatory (see Figure 2). Based on known non-oscillation results for = 0 in the continuous case (see, eg, other studies [46][47][48][49][50][51], we conjecture that the equation is non-oscillatory if the opposite inequality holds. It is an open problem.…”
Section: Corollary 51 Let Us Consider the Equationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We have (see ) rα=02normaletdt+normale2·(32)+110·(53)+a·(65)=65+a and sα=02arctantdt+arctan2·(32)+0·(53)+e·(65)=eln52+3arctan2. Consequently, we can write as rαsα=65+aeln52+3arctan2>α21β24=9(1β)2, ie, a>18(1β)22eln5+6arctan265. If this inequality is valid, the considered equation is oscillatory (see Figure ). Based on known non‐oscillation results for β = 0 in the continuous case (see, eg, other studies…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we combine the adapted Riccati equation with the Prüfer technique and involve the averaging method. Then we use the equivalence of the non-oscillation of the given equation and the boundedness of the Prüfer angle (for variations of such approach, see, e.g., [17,33,39,45]).…”
Section: Corollary 54 Consider the Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main idea is the equivalence of the boundedness of ϕ and the non-oscillation of Eq. (2.4) (see directly[17, Corollary 4.1] or, e.g.,[12,45,53]). Regarding a solution ϕ of Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%