2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.77.012409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling inCo(4Å)Pt(tPt

Abstract: In this work, we have demonstrated the existence of oscillatory antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling in the Co/ Pt multilayer with perpendicular anisotropy by using the sample configuration of ͓Pt͑6 Å͒ / Co͑4 Å͔͒ / Pt͑t Pt Å͒ / ͓Co͑4 Å͒ / Pt͑6 Å͒ / Co͑4 Å͔͒ / NiO͑20 Å͒. As a function of t Pt , there exists a transition of the interlayer coupling from ferromagnetic to antiferromagnetic. At t Pt Ͻ 25 Å, the interlayer coupling between Co layers is always ferromagnetic, while at t Pt Ͼ 25 Å, the antiferromagneti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oscillatory coupling through the Pt layers, as expected by the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida model, has been verified for Pt/Co multilayers [39,40]. Differences between various systems may arise due to the superimposed magnetostatic interactions originating from roughness, which decay exponentially with increasing Pt spacer thickness [39]. Magnetron sputtered Co/Pt multilayers [40] show a local minimum at x¼1 nm followed by a weak local maximum and monotonous decrease at higher thicknesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oscillatory coupling through the Pt layers, as expected by the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida model, has been verified for Pt/Co multilayers [39,40]. Differences between various systems may arise due to the superimposed magnetostatic interactions originating from roughness, which decay exponentially with increasing Pt spacer thickness [39]. Magnetron sputtered Co/Pt multilayers [40] show a local minimum at x¼1 nm followed by a weak local maximum and monotonous decrease at higher thicknesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…5, must be attributed to the oscillatory nature of exchange coupling through the Pt layers. Oscillatory coupling through the Pt layers, as expected by the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida model, has been verified for Pt/Co multilayers [39,40]. Differences between various systems may arise due to the superimposed magnetostatic interactions originating from roughness, which decay exponentially with increasing Pt spacer thickness [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We thus attribute the net coupling to an RKKY-type of exchange as reported in Refs. [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GdFeCo and Co/Pt net moments present an AFM coupling for thick spacers, as was found in Refs. [13][14][15] . An RKKYtype of exchange [13][14][15][16] or a dipolar orange peel coupling 13,17 could explain such AFM coupling.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13-15. An RKKY-type of exchange [13][14][15][16] or a dipolar orange peel coupling 13,17 could explain such AFM coupling. However, in Gd dominated samples, H b has an opposite sign (example shown in the supplementary material, Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%