2017
DOI: 10.18514/mmn.2017.2326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory behavior of second order damped neutral differential equations with distributed deviating arguments

Abstract: The authors establish some new criteria for the oscillation of second order damped nonlinear neutral differential equations with distributed deviating arguments. Two examples are also provided to illustrate the results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case where γ ≤ β, using the facts u(t) > 0 and u (t) > 0, we have u(t) ≥ B > 0 for t sufficiently large. It follows from (2.4) and (2.7) that 17) where C = min{A, B}. The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1 and so we omit it.…”
Section: Theorem 22 If Every Solution Ofmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the case where γ ≤ β, using the facts u(t) > 0 and u (t) > 0, we have u(t) ≥ B > 0 for t sufficiently large. It follows from (2.4) and (2.7) that 17) where C = min{A, B}. The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1 and so we omit it.…”
Section: Theorem 22 If Every Solution Ofmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In recent years, there has been a great interest in investigating the oscillatory behavior of solutions of various classes of second order neutral differential equations without damping term, and we refer the reader to the papers [2,3,4,5,8,11,12,13,14,16,17,18,19,21] and the references therein as examples of recent results on this topic. However, determining oscillation criteria for second-order neutral differential equations with damping term has not received a great deal of attention in the literature; moreover, the results obtained are for the cases 0 < p(t) ≤ p 0 < 1 or −1 < p 0 ≤ p(t) < 0, see the papers [7,9,20] as example. This means that the results obtained in these papers cannot be applied to the case where p(t) → ∞ as t → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some typical results, we refer the reader to [2][3][4]7,8,[10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20]23] and the references cited therein as examples of recent results on this topic. However, results on the oscillatory behavior of solutions of second-order neutral differential equations with damping term are relatively scarce in the literature; some results can be found, for example, in [5,6,21,22]. It should be noted that although papers [5,6,21,22] deal with second-order neutral differential equations with damping term, the results obtained in these papers except [22] cannot be applied to the case where h(t) → ∞ as t → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results on the oscillatory behavior of solutions of second-order neutral differential equations with damping term are relatively scarce in the literature; some results can be found, for example, in [5,6,21,22]. It should be noted that although papers [5,6,21,22] deal with second-order neutral differential equations with damping term, the results obtained in these papers except [22] cannot be applied to the case where h(t) → ∞ as t → ∞. Motivated by the above observations, here we wish to develop sufficient conditions for equation (1.1) to be oscillatory in the case where h(t) > 1 and/or h(t) → ∞ as t → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%