2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory signatures of Repetition Suppression and Novelty Detection reveal altered induced visual responses in early deafness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With orthographic visual stimuli, our group found stronger alpha ERD after stimulus onset across parietal scalp regions in CI users that may reflect stronger intramodal responses, but this activity did not correlate to SIN ability 29 . Early deaf individuals show reduced parietal scalp ERD in alpha and beta (15–25 Hz) rhythms for novel visual events (morphing circles) compared to NH controls, interpreted as a modification to automatic deviance detection for visual events in early deafness, or changes in the deployment of visual attention or inhibition 60 . These findings only suggest that CI users or deaf participants are expected to differ from control groups when measuring alpha rhythms in visual perception, but task- and stimulus-based differences make synthesis of findings difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With orthographic visual stimuli, our group found stronger alpha ERD after stimulus onset across parietal scalp regions in CI users that may reflect stronger intramodal responses, but this activity did not correlate to SIN ability 29 . Early deaf individuals show reduced parietal scalp ERD in alpha and beta (15–25 Hz) rhythms for novel visual events (morphing circles) compared to NH controls, interpreted as a modification to automatic deviance detection for visual events in early deafness, or changes in the deployment of visual attention or inhibition 60 . These findings only suggest that CI users or deaf participants are expected to differ from control groups when measuring alpha rhythms in visual perception, but task- and stimulus-based differences make synthesis of findings difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evidence of alterations of induced oscillatory activity following sensory deprivation was reported not only within modality, for visual (Bottari et al, 2016) and auditory systems (Yusuf et al, 2017), but also cross-modally. In humans, early-onset deafness selectively affects induced oscillatory activity associated with visual processing (Bednaya et al, 2021). The present audio-visual MD effect (increased induced gamma activity) provides evidence in the same direction also for multisensory processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, distinct components of neural oscillations characterize different types of processing according to the direction of information flow: while the evoked activity, which is phase-locked to the stimulation, has mainly been associated with feedforward processing (thalamo-cortical), the induced oscillatory activity, which is not phase-locked to the onset of the stimulus, has mainly been associated with feedback processing (cortico-cortical connectivity, Klimesch et al, 1998; Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999; Chen et al, 2012). Studies in humans and non-human animal models demonstrated that permanent sensory deprivation primarily affects induced oscillatory activity (Bottari et al, 2016; Yusuf et al, 2017; Bednaya et al, 2021). As homeostatic plasticity is an intrinsic feedback mechanism (Turrigiano and Nelson, 2004), we predicted to primarily observe changes in induced oscillatory activity following temporary MD for both visual and audio-visual processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%